Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online June 1, 2019
Request permissions

Disproportionate impact of radiation and radiation regulation

Mary Olson [email protected]View all authors and affiliations
Volume 44, Issue 2
https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2019.1603864
View correction

Abstract

Reference Man is used for generic evaluation of ionizing radiation impacts, regulation, and nuclear licensing decisions made by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC). The United States Code of Federal Regulations, 2018 edition, Chapter 10: Part 20 ‘Standards for Protection Against Radiation’ contains eight references to ‘reference man’ as the basis for regulation and calculation of radiation exposure. The document was accessed January 9, 2019 (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2018-title10-vol1/pdf/CFR-2018-title10-vol1-part20.pdf). Findings from 60 years of A-bomb survivor data show that Reference Man does not represent the human life cycle with respect to harm from radiation exposure. Findings reported here show females are more harmed by radiation, particularly when exposed as young girls, than is predicted by use of Reference Man; the difference is a much as 7-fold. Since females have been ignored in regulatory analysis, this has resulted in systematic under-reporting of harm from ionizing radiation exposure in the global population. A critique is also offered on the US Environmental Protection Agency's attempt to include females in its regulation. Recommendations for interim regulation to provide better protection, and questions for further study are offered.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

American College of Radiology. 2018. Website “RadiologyInfo.org” Accessed March 15, 2019. https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=safety-hiw_03.
Google Scholar
Bertell Rosalie. 1985. No Immediate Danger? Prognosis for a Radioactive Earth. Women's Press, Toronto, ON, Canada. 108–109.
Google Scholar
ECRR. 2010. Busby, Chris, Dr Rosalie Bertell, Inge Schmitz Feuerhake, Alexey V. Yablokov (Editor), Molly Scott Cato (Editor). ECRR 2010 Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk: The Health Effects of Exposure to Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation. Page 81, Table 8.2.
Google Scholar
ICRP. 2010. Conversion Coefficients for Radiological Protection Quantities for External Radiation Exposures. ICRP Publication 116, Ann. ICRP 40(2-5). Text cited posted here. Accessed March 3, 2019. http://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=icrp%20publication%20116.
Google Scholar
International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1975. Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. [ICRP Publication] No. 23 . Oxford: Pergamon Press. Page 4.
Google Scholar
Kmentt Alexander. 2015. “The Human Cost of Nuclear Weapons. ” International Review of the Red Cross (2015) , 696.
Crossref
Web of Science
Google Scholar
Lassiter Lauren. 2017. Original Suggestion of Causation made during Class Discussion with the Author, April, 2017 . Asheboro, NC: Randolph Community College.
Google Scholar
Linet Martha s, Slovis Thomas L., Miller Donald L., et al. 2012. “Cancer Risks Associated with External Radiation from Diagnostic Imaging Procedures. ” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 62: 75–100.
Crossref
PubMed
Web of Science
Google Scholar
Makhijani Arjun, Smith Brice, and Thorne Michael C. 2006. Science for the Vulnerable: Setting Radiation and Multiple Exposure Standards . Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. Accessed January 11, 2019. https://ieer.org/resource/depleted-uranium/science-vulnerable-setting-radiation/.
Google Scholar
National Academy of Science, National Research Council. 1990. Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation. “Health Effects of Exposure to Low-Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR V.” Summary and Conclusions, page 4.
Google Scholar
National Academy of Science, National Research Council. 2006. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. “Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2.” Chapter 12 “Estimating Cancer Risk,” in particular tables of data on pages 280, 311 and 312.
Google Scholar
Olson Mary. 2011. “Atomic Radiation is More Harmful to Women.” Originally published by Nuclear Information and Resource Service, October 2011. Accessed January 11, 2019. https://www.nirs.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/corrected-radiationwomenfinal.pdf.
Google Scholar
Olson Mary. 2014. “Nuclear: War of Human Consequences” presentation to the Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Consequences of Nuclear War, December, 2014, Vienna, Austria. Accessible on-line in video form here: https://www.genderandradiation.org/presentations and in document form: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b7c3df296e76fcbb0befb77/t/5baabca9419202c5984d8926/1537916077347/ViennaConf14-OLSON-Gender-Radiation-Presentation.pdf.
Google Scholar
Peterson Craig L., and Côté Jacques. 2004. “Cellular Machineries for Chromosomal DNA Repair. ” Genes & Development 18: 602–616. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Accessed January 9, 2019 http://genesdev.cshlp.org/.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Rabbe Otto G. 2011. “Toward Improved Ionizing Safety Standards. ” Health Physics 101 (1): 84–93.
Crossref
PubMed
Web of Science
Google Scholar
RERF. 2019. Overview of Radiation Effects Research Foundation Research Activities: the Life Span Study. Posted on RERF website, Accessed March 9, 2019 https://www.rerf.or.jp/en/programs/research_activities_e/outline_e/proglss-en/.
Google Scholar
Richardson David B, Cardis Elisabeth, Daniel Robert D, Gillies Michael, O'Hagan Jacqueline A., Hamra Ghassan B., Haylock Richard, et al. 2015. “Risk of Cancer from Occupational Exposure to Ionising Radiation: Retrospective Cohort Study of Workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS). ” BMJ 351.
Crossref
PubMed
Web of Science
Google Scholar
Scott Anne M., Bsrs R.T.(R). 2014. Current Issues in Radiation Dose Monitoring and Reporting. Radiologic Technology , 85 (5).
PubMed
Google Scholar
Semelka Richard C., Armao Diane M., Elias Jorge Jr, . and Picano Eugenio. 2012. “The Information Imperative: Is It Time for an Informed Consent Process Explaining the Risks of Medical Radiation?” Radiology 262: 15–18.
Crossref
PubMed
Web of Science
Google Scholar
TPNW. 2017. The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons of 2017 . United Nations.
Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science and Technology Information and Office of History and Heritage Resources. 2019. The Manhattan Project: The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima. Website, Accessed March 9, 2019. https://www.osti.gov/opennet/manhattan-project-history/Events/1945/hiroshima.htm.
Google Scholar
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1999. Regulatory Guide #13 Accessed January 11, 2019 via: https://www.epa.gov/radiation/federal-guidance-report-no-13-cancer-risk-coefficients-environmental-exposure.
Google Scholar
U.S. National Park Service. 2018. Manhattan Project National Historical Park. Website subpage on history and culture was Accessed February 2, 2019. https://www.nps.gov/mapr/learn/historyculture/index.htm.
Google Scholar
US NRC (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission). 1990. Policy Statement on Below Regulatory Concern. 55 Fed. Reg. 27,522 (1990), May.
Google Scholar
US NRC (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission). 2018. The United States Code of Federal Regulations, 2018 edition, “Chapter 10: Part 20 ‘Standards for Protection Against Radiation’ Contains Eight References to ‘Reference Man’ as the Basis for Regulation and Calculation of Radiation Exposure. The document was Accessed January 9, 2019 here: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2018-title10-vol1/pdf/CFR-2018-title10-vol1-part20.pdf.
Google Scholar
Wald Matthew. 1999. “Karl Z. Morgan, 91, Founder of the Field Of Health Physics, Dies in Tennessee.” New York Times, 13 June 1999. Accessed February 9, 2019. via https://www.nytimes.com/1999/06/13/us/karl-z-morgan-91-founder-of-the-field-of-health-physics-dies-in-tennessee.html.
Google Scholar

Biographies

Mary Olson is Acting Director of the Gender and Radiation Impact Project. She served from 1991 to 2019 as Staff Biologist and Senior Radioactive Waste Policy Analyst at US-based Nuclear Information and Resource Service, a non-government organization. Olson's work on radiation education led her to the question of whether biological sex is a factor in radiation harm. Her paper, ‘Atomic Radiation is More Harmful to Women’ (2011) was featured at the Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Impacts of Nuclear Weapons (2014); at the UN Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Review of 2015; the International Committee of the Red Cross Asia regional meeting in St Petersburg, Russia, and the EU Gender Summit, in Brussels, both in 2016. Olson spoke at the EU Gender Summit in London, 2018, as well as the Low-Dose Radiation Conference in Stirling, Scotland. Olson is currently raising funds to support new research in existing labs (students and post-docs) on sex differences and radiation harm.
|

Also from Sage