Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 15, 2017

Promoting Sustainable Consumption Behaviors: The Impacts of Environmental Attitudes and Governance in a Cross-National Context

Abstract

This article assesses the impacts of individual-level environmental attitudes and national-level environmental governance on individual sustainable consumption. Multilevel analysis based on data from 31 countries shows that three key environmental attitudes, environmental concern, environmental efficacy, and perceived environmental impact, are all positively associated with sustainable consumption behavior. Environmental governance is found to have different impacts in high-income compared with other countries analyzed. In high-income countries, effective environmental governance encourages people to participate in sustainable consumption, whereas it discourages people’s participation in other countries. In addition, in high-income countries, people with strong proenvironmental attitudes are more likely to consume sustainably in the face of weak environmental governance; in other countries, however, the attitude–behavior association is strengthened in the face of effective governance. The results highlight the importance of individual attitudes and the broader context in influencing proenvironmental behaviors, and suggest that sustainable consumption should be understood as a social process accomplished through collaboration between individual consumers and institutions.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
Ajzen I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Baldassare M., Katz C. (1992). The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices. Environment & Behavior, 24, 602-616.
Bang H.-K., Ellinger A. E., Hadjimarcou J., Traichal P. A. (2000). Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 449-468.
Betsill M. M., Bulkeley H. (2004). Transnational networks and global environmental governance: The cities for climate protection program. International Studies Quarterly, 48, 471-493.
Bland J. M., Altman D. G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. British Medical Journal, 314(7080), Article 572.
Boli J., Thomas G. M. (1997). World culture in the world polity: A century of international non-governmental organization. American Sociological Review, 62, 171-190.
Cardenas J. C., Stranlund J., Willis C. (2000). Local environmental control and institutional crowding-out. World Development, 28, 1719-1733.
Chawla L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 15-26.
Connolly J., Prothero A. (2008). Green consumption: Life-politics, risk and contradictions. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8, 117-145.
Dauvergne P. (2011). Globalization and the environment. In Ravenhill J. (Ed.), Global political economy (3rd ed., pp. 450-480). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Davies J., Foxall G. R., Pallister J. (2002). Beyond the intention–behaviour mythology: An integrated model of recycling. Marketing Theory, 2, 29-113.
Deci E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.
Derksen L., Gartrell J. (1993). The social context of recycling. American Sociological Review, 58, 434-442.
Diamantopoulos A., Schlegelmilch B. B., Sinkovics R. R., Bohlen G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 465-480.
Ellen P. S., Wiener J. L., Cobb-Walgren C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10, 102-117.
Enders C. K., Tofighi D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121-138.
European Environment Agency. (2006). Using the market for cost-effective environmental policy: Market-based instruments in Europe. Copenhagen, Denmark: Author.
Ewers R. M. (2006). Interaction effects between economic development and forest cover determine deforestation rates. Global Environmental Change, 16, 161-169.
Fahlquist J. N. (2009). Moral responsibility for environmental problems—Individual or institutional? Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 22, 109-124.
Frank D. J., Hironaka A., Schofer E. (2000a). Environmentalism as a global institution: Reply to Buttel. American Sociological Review, 65, 122-127.
Frank D. J., Hironaka A., Schofer E. (2000b). The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 65, 96-116.
Fransson N., GäRling T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 369-382.
Frey B. S. (2012). Crowding out and crowding in of intrinsic preferences. In Brousseau E., Dedeurwaerdere T., Siebenhüner B. (Eds.), Reflective governance for global public goods (pp. 75-83). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frey B. S., Jegen R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 589-611.
Frey B. S., Oberholzer-Gee F. (1997). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. The American Economic Review, 87, 746-755.
Frey B. S., Oberholzer-Gee F., Eichenberger R. (1996). The old lady visits your backyard: A tale of morals and markets. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 1297-1313.
Gardner G. T., Stern P. C. (1996). Environmental problems and human behavior (Vol. xiv). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Givens J. E., Jorgenson A. K. (2011). The effects of affluence, economic development, and environmental degradation on environmental concern: A multilevel analysis. Organization & Environment, 24, 74-91.
Givens J. E., Jorgenson A. K. (2013). Individual environmental concern in the world polity: A multilevel analysis. Social Science Research, 42, 418-431.
Howell A. P., Shaw B. R., Alvarez G. (2015). Bait shop owners as opinion leaders: A test of the theory of planned behavior to predict pro-environmental outreach behaviors and intentions. Environment & Behavior, 47, 1107-1126.
Inglehart R. (2003). Human values and social change: Findings from the values surveys. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
Inglehart R., Baker W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19-51.
Inglehart R., Welzel C. (2003). Political culture and democracy: Analyzing cross-level linkages. Comparative Politics, 36, 61-79.
Kerr J., Vardhan M., Jindal R. (2012). Prosocial behavior and incentives: Evidence from field experiments in rural Mexico and Tanzania. Ecological Economics, 73, 220-227.
Kollmuss A., Agyeman J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239-260.
Lemos M. C., Agrawal A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 297-325.
Liu X., Wang C., Shishime T., Fujitsuka T. (2012). Sustainable consumption: Green purchasing behaviours of urban residents in China. Sustainable Development, 20, 293-308.
Longhofer W., Schofer E. (2010). National and global origins of environmental association. American Sociological Review, 75, 505-533.
Macias T., Williams K. (2016). Know your neighbors, save the planet: Social capital and the widening wedge of pro-environmental outcomes. Environment & Behavior, 48, 391-420.
McKenzie-Mohr D. (2011). Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing (3rd ed.). Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society Publishers.
Meyer J. W. (2010). World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1-20.
Meyer J. W., Boli J., Thomas G. M., Ramirez F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144-181.
Meyer J. W., Frank D. J., Hironaka A., Schofer E., Tuma N. B. (1997). The structuring of a world environmental regime, 1870–1990. International Organization, 51, 623-651.
Minton A. P., Rose R. L. (1997). The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendly consumer behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 40, 37-48.
Moisander J. (2007). Motivational complexity of green consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31, 404-409.
Oreg S., Katz-Gerro T. (2006). Predicting proenvironmental behavior cross-nationally: Values, the theory of planned behavior, and value-belief-norm theory. Environment & Behavior, 38, 462-483.
Ostmann A. (1998). External control may destroy the commons. Rationality and Society, 10, 103-122.
Parikh J., Shukla V. (1995). Urbanization, energy use and greenhouse effects in economic development: Results from a cross-national study of developing countries. Global Environmental Change, 5, 87-103.
Parris T. M., Kates R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559-586.
Peattie K. (2010). Green consumption: Behavior and norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 195-228.
Poortinga W., Calve T., Jones N., Lannon S., Rees T., Rodgers S. E., . . . Johnson R. (2016). Neighborhood quality and attachment: Validation of the revised residential environment assessment tool. Environment & Behavior. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://eab.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/03/07/0013916516634403.
Poortinga W., Steg L., Vlek C. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment & Behavior, 36, 70-93.
Prakash A., Potoski M. (2006). Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 350-364.
Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Roberts J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36, 217-231.
Roberts J. A., Bacon D. R. (1997). Exploring the subtle relationships between environmental concern and ecologically conscious consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 40, 79-89.
Robertson M. M. (2004). The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: Wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum, 35, 361-373.
Schultz P. W., Bator R. J., Large L. B., Bruni C. M., Tabanico J. J. (2013). Littering in context: Personal and environmental predictors of littering behavior. Environment & Behavior, 45, 35-59.
Seyfang G. (2006). Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: Examining local organic food networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 383-395.
Shandra J. M. (2007). The world polity and deforestation: A quantitative, cross-national analysis. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 48, 5-27.
Shandra J. M., Leckband C., McKinney L. A., London B. (2009). Ecologically unequal exchange, world polity, and biodiversity loss: A cross-national analysis of threatened mammals. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50, 285-310.
Spaargaren G. (2011). Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture. Global Environmental Change, 21, 813-822.
Stern P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
Straughan R. D., Roberts J. A. (1999). Environmental segmentation alternatives: A look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16, 558-575.
Titmuss R. M. (1972). The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Travers H., Clements T., Keane A., Milner-Gulland E. J. (2011). Incentives for cooperation: The effects of institutional controls on common pool resource extraction in Cambodia. Ecological Economics, 71, 151-161.
United Nations. (1998). Human development report. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/
United Nations Environmental Programme. (2016). UNEP environmental governance sub-programme. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/environmentalgovernance/
Van Vliet B., Chappells H., Shove E. (2005). Infrastructures of consumption: Environmental innovation in the utility industries. London, England: Earthscan.
Vasi I. B. (2007). Thinking globally, planning nationally and acting locally: Nested organizational fields and the adoption of environmental practices. Social Forces, 86, 113-136.
Vermeir I., Verbeke W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 19, 169-194.
Vermeir I., Verbeke W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64, 542-553.
Vicente-Molina M. A., Fernández-Sáinz A., Izagirre-Olaizola J. (2013). Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behaviour: Comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61, 130-138.
Wang P., Liu Q., Qi Y. (2014). Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: A survey of the rural residents in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 152-165.
Wapner P. (1996). Environmental activism and world civic politics (Underlining edition). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Welsch H., Kühling J. (2009). Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: The role of reference groups and routine behavior. Ecological Economics, 69, 166-176.
World Bank. (2015). World development indicators, 1960-2013. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
World Bank. (2016). World Bank country and lending groups. Retrieved from https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519
Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, Center for International Earth Science Information Network at Columbia University, World Economic Forum, & Joint Research Centre of European Commission. (2005). 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI). NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Retrieved from http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/esi-environmental-sustainability-index-2005
York R., Rosa E. A., Dietz T. (2003). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68, 279-300.

Biographies

Yan Wang is an assistant professor at the Department of Sociology, Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, China. Her current research interests include environmental sociology, social inequality, and cross-national studies.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.