Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online April 5, 2026

Dismantling or Drifting? The Politics of Bolsa Família’s Transformation under Brazil’s Far-Right Government

Abstract

How did the COVID-19 crisis under a far-right government shape social policy responses in Brazil? This article examines the transformation of the flagship cash transfer program from Bolsa Família into Auxílio Brasil under the Bolsonaro administration. Drawing on qualitative data from interviews, government documents, and media analysis, we argue that the program was not dismantled but instead evolved through a process of “drift.” While the program maintained a similar outward form, it diverged from its original goals of combating poverty and fostering human capital development, becoming increasingly ineffective due to the erosion of eligibility thresholds and benefit amounts. This drift was propelled by axiological and regulatory ambiguities embedded in the program’s original design and that persisted over time. This highlights the need for more effective social policy design to safeguard against the risk of policies becoming increasingly inadequate in the face of adverse circumstances.
¿Cómo incidió la crisis de la COVID-19, bajo un gobierno de extrema derecha, en la configuración de las respuestas de política social en Brasil? Este artículo examina la transformación del programa emblemático de transferencias monetarias, Bolsa Família, en Auxílio Brasil durante la administración de Bolsonaro. A partir de datos cualitativos provenientes de entrevistas, documentos oficiales y análisis de medios de comunicación, sostenemos que el programa no fue desmantelado, sino que fue objeto de modificaciones graduales. Si bien conservó una forma externa similar, se apartó de sus objetivos originales de combate a la pobreza y de promoción del desarrollo del capital humano, tornándose crecientemente ineficaz debido a la erosión de los umbrales de elegibilidad y de los montos de las prestaciones. Este proceso de deriva fue impulsado por ambigüedades axiológicas y regulatorias incorporadas en el diseño original del programa y que persistieron a lo largo del tiempo. Lo anterior pone de relieve la necesidad de un diseño de políticas sociales más robusto y eficaz, capaz de resguardar los programas frente al riesgo de volverse progresivamente inadecuados ante contextos adversos.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Agência CNM de Notícias 2021 “CNM lamenta queda de repasses para assistência social em audiência na câmara.” Confederação Nacional de Municípos, November 11.
Akkoyunlu Karabekir, Lima José Antonio 2022 “Brazil’s stealth military intervention.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 14 (1): 31–54.
Arretche Marta, Marques Eduardo Cesar, Pimenta de Faria Carlos Aurélio (eds.)2019 As políticas da política: Desigualdades e enclusão nos governos do PSDB e Do PT. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.
Arretche Marta, Souza Pedro 2024 “When incumbents successfully retrench big and popular social policies: Policy design matters.” Journal of Public Policy 44 (3): 592–613.
Barberia Lorena G., Gómez Eduardo J. 2020 “Political and institutional perils of Brazil’s COVID-19 crisis.” The Lancet 396 (10248): 367–68.
Bartholo Letícia 2022 “Direitos improvisados.” Quatro Cinco Um, March 1. https://www.quatrocincoum.com.br/br/artigos/desigualdades/direitos-improvisados.
Bartholo Letícia, Barbosa Rogério Jerônimo, de Bolle Monica, de Souza Pedro Ferreira 2020 “A pobreza na posta-restante.” Piauí, August 25.
Bartholo Letícia, de Paiva Andrea, Natalino Marco, Licio Elaine Cristina, Pinheiro Marina Brito 2020 “O financiamento federal dos serviços socioassistenciais no contexto da COVID-19.” Diretoria de Estudos e Políticas Sociais 80. Brasília: IPEA.
Bauer Michael W., Peters B. Guy, Pierre Jon, Yesilkagit Kutsal, Becker Stefan 2021 “Introduction: Populists, democratic backsliding, and public administration,” pp. 1–21 in Bauer Michael W., Peters B. Guy, Pierre Jon, Yesilkagit Kutsal, Becker Stefan (eds.), Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration, Cambridge University Press.
Bichir Renata Mirandola 2015 “Capacidades estatais para a implementação de programas de transferência de renda. Os casos de Brasil, Argentina e África do Sul.” Texto para discussão 2032. Brasília, Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.
Blofield Merike, Giambruno Cecilia, Pribble Jennifer 2021 “Breadth and sufficiency of cash transfer responses in ten Latin American countries during the first 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic.” Commitment to Equity Institute. CEQ Working Paper 114. September.
Bolch Kimberly 2022 “Studying the state through the lens of Bolsa Família: Policy preservation under adverse circumstances in Brazil.” PhD dissertation, University of Oxford.
Bronzatto Thiago 2019 “Estou frustrado.” Veja, January 29. https://veja.abril.com.br/politica/estou-frustrado/.
Bronzo Carla, Oliveira Breynner, Cireno Flávio, de Araújo Edgilson Tavares, Jannuzzi Paulo 2021 “Auxílio Brasil não é o Bolsa Família melhorado: Um salto no abismo e o desmonte da proteção social no Brasil.” Estada-o, November 11.
Cameron Maxwell A., Hurtado Veronica, Sosa-Villagarcia Paolo, Gombata Marsílea 2023 “A tale of two crashes: Pandemic politics in Brazil and Peru.” Latin American Perspectives 50 (4): 248-267.
Campbell John L. 2004 Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Capoccia Giovanni, Kelemen R. Daniel 2007 “The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism.” World Politics 59 (3): 341–69.
Castro Marcia C., Massuda Adriano, Almeida Gisele, Menezes-Filho Naercio Aquino, Andrade Monica Viegas, de Souza Noronha Kenya Valéria Micaela, Rocha Rudi, et al. 2019 “Brazil’s unified health system: The first 30 years and prospects for the future.” The Lancet 394 (10195): 345–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31243-7.
Coêlho Denilson Bandeira 2012 “Political competition and the diffusion of conditional cash transfers in Brazil.” Brazilian Political Science Review 6 (2).
Congresso Nacional 2021 “Veto n° 70/2021 parcial em tramitação (Programas Auxílio Brasil e Alimenta Brasil).” https://www.congressonacional.leg.br/materias/vetos/-/veto/detalhe/14945.
Conselho Nacional de Saúde 2020 “Saúde perdeu R$ 20 bilhões em 2019 por causa da EC 95/2016.” February 28. http://www.conselho.saude.gov.br/ultimas-noticias-cns/1044-saude-perdeu-r-20-bilhoes-em-2019-por-causa-da-ec-95-2016.
Couri Daniel 2022 “O auxílio Brasil repetirá as filas do Bolsa Família?” Nexo Jornal, February 25.
Fagnani Eduardo 2017 “O fim do breve ciclo da cidadania social no Brasil (1988-2015).” Text for discussion no. 308. Campinas: Instituto de Economia, Unicamp.
Fenwick Tracy Beck, Rennó Lucio 2023 “Policy capacity: Explaining the surprising durability of CCTs in Brazil.” Global Social Policy 23 (2): 325–42.
Fernandes Adriana 2021a “Governistas fazem pressão para relator do Auxílio Brasil tirar correção automática de relatório.” Estadão, November 23. https://economia.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,governistas-fazem-pressao-para-relator-do-auxilio-brasil-tirar-correcao-automatica-de-relatorio,70003906594.
Fernandes Adriana 2021b “Relator muda texto do Auxílio Brasil e inclui reajuste automático pela inflação.” Estadão, November 23. https://economia.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,relator-muda-texto-do-auxilio-brasil-e-inclui-reajuste-automatico-pela-inflacao,70003905939.
Fundação Getulio Vargas – Centro de Políticas Sociais (FGV – CPS) 2020 “FGV Social comenta os cortes no bolsa família e o aumento da extrema pobreza no Brasil.” March 3. https://cps.fgv.br/destaques/fgv-social-comenta-os-cortes-no-bolsa-familia-e-o-aumento-da-extrema-pobreza-no-brasil.
Fonseca Elize Massard Da, Nattrass Nicoli, Lazaro Lira Luz Benites, Bastos Francisco Inácio 2021 “Political discourse, denialism and leadership failure in Brazil’s response to COVID-19.” Global Public Health 16 (8–9): 1251–66.
Galvin Daniel J., Hacker Jacob S. 2020 “The political effects of policy drift: Policy stalemate and American political development.” Studies in American Political Development 34 (2): 216–38.
Gentilini Ugo, Almenfi Mohamed, Orton Ian, Dale Pamela 2021 “Social protection and jobs responses to COVID-19: A real-time review of country measures. ‘Living Paper’ Version 15 (May 14, 2021).” World Bank, Washington, DC.
Gerbelli Luiz G., Salati Paula 2020 “Medidas econômicas para combater Coronavírus ajudam, mas são insuficientes, dizem analistas.” G1, March 16.
Gomide Alexandre de Ávila, de Sá Silva Michelle Morais, Leopoldi Maria Antonieta (eds.) 2023 Desmonte e reconfiguração de políticas públicas (2016-2022). Brasília: IPEA.
Gorziza Amanda, Guimarães Hellen, Buono Renata 2021 “Brasil, Planeta Fome.” Revista Piauí, December 6.
Greer Scott L., Fonseca Elize Massard, Raj Minakshi, Willison Charley E. 2022 “Institutions and the politics of agency in COVID-19 response: Federalism, executive power, and public health policy in Brazil, India, and the U.S.” Journal of Social Policy 53 (3): 792–810.
Hacker Jacob 2005 “Policy drift: The hidden politics of US welfare state retrenchment,” pp. 180–208 in Streeck Wolfgang, Thelen Katheen (eds.), Institutional Changes in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haggard Stephan, Kaufman Robert 2021 “The anatomy of democratic backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 32 (4): 27–41.
Jaccoud Luciana, Bichir Renata, Mesquita Ana Cleusa 2017 “O SUAS na proteção social brasileira: Transformações recentes e perspectivas.” Novos Estudos - CEBRAP 36 (02): 37–53.
Lavinas Lena, Gentil Denise 2020 “Social policy since Rousseff: Misrepresentation and marginalization.” Latin American Perspectives 47 (2): 101–16.
Lourenço Iolando 2015 “Relator do orçamento confirma corte de R$ 10 bilhões no Bolsa Família.” Agência Brasil, December 11.
Lührmann Anna, Lindberg Staffan I. 2019 “A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it?” Democratization 26 (7): 1095–1113.
Maia Rodrigo 2018 “O caminho é o controle de despesas.” Correio Braziliense, June 7.
Niedzwiecki Sara, Pribble Jennifer 2023 “Social policy expansion and retrenchment in Latin America: Causal paths to successful reform.” Journal of Social Policy 54: 1–21.
Ortega Francisco, Orsini Michael 2020 “Governing COVID-19 without government in Brazil: Ignorance, neoliberal authoritarianism, and the collapse of public health leadership.” Global Public Health 15 (9): 1257–77.
Ouverney Assis Luiz Mafort, Fernandes Fernando Manuel Bessa 2022 “Legislative and executive branches in the COVID-19 pandemic: The emergence of a critical federative juncture?” Saúde Debate 46 (1): 33–47.
Paiva Luis Henrique, Falcão Tiago, Bartholo Letícia 2013 “Do Bolsa família ao Brasil sem miséria: Um resumo do percurso brasileiro recente na busca da superação da pobreza extrema,” pp. 25–146 in Campello Tereza, Neri Marcelo Cortes (eds.), Programa Bolsa família: Uma década de inclusão e cidadania. Brasília: Ipea.
Pierson Paul 1993 “When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change.” World Politics 45 (4): 595–628.
Pierson Paul 1995 Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pinotti Fernanda, Farfan Tainá 2021 “Relator desiste de manter reajuste anual em texto da MP do Auxílio Brasil.” CNN Brasil, November 25. https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/business/relator-desiste-de-manter-reajuste-anual-em-texto-da-mp-do-auxilio-brasil/.
Pozzebom Elina R. 2020 “Aprovado pelo congresso, auxílio emergencial deu dignidade a cidadãos durante a pandemia.” Agência Senado, December 30.
Resende Sara 2021 “Auxílio Brasil: Senado aprova MP que cria programa sucessor do Bolsa Família; texto vai à sanção.” Globo G1 Política, December 2. https://g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2021/12/02/auxilio-brasil-senado-aprova-mp-que-cria-programa-sucessor-do-bolsa-familia-texto-vai-a-sancao.ghtml.
Resende Thiago 2019 “Governo não diz como cobrirá buraco de R$ 1 bi no Bolsa família neste mês.” Folha de São Paulo, December 20.
Resende Thiago 2020 “Governo usa verba de aposentadoria e pensões para pagar 13o do Bolsa Família.” Folha de São Paulo, January 7.
Ricard Julie, Medeiros Juliano 2020 “Using misinformation as a political weapon: COVID-19 and Bolsonaro in Brazil.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, April.
Rossi Pedro, Dweck Esther 2016 “Impactos do novo regime fiscal na saúde e educação.” Cadernos de Saúde Pública 32 (12).
Roubicek Marcelo 2021 “Orçamento: O que diz o acordo entre governo e Congresso.” Nexo Jornal, April 20.
Soares Jussara 2019 “Governo Bolsonaro quer implementar ‘meritocracia’ no novo Bolsa Família.” O Globo, December 8.
Sordi Denise De 2021 “Auxílio Brasil é um retrocesso que corrói rede de proteção social.” Folha de Sao Paulo, October 23.
Streeck Wolfgang, Thelen Kathleen 2005 Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: University Press.
Sugiyama Natasha Borges 2012 “Bottom-up policy diffusion: National emulation of a conditional cash transfer program in Brazil.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 42 (1): 25-51.
Thelen Kathleen, Mahoney James 2010 “A theory of gradual institutional change,” pp. 1–37 in Thelen Kathleen, Mahoney James (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomazini Carla 2010 “As coalizões de causa em torno das políticas de transferências condicionadas: Olhar cruzado Brasil-México.” Carta Internacional 5 (22): 37–55.
Tomazini Carla 2017 “Beyond consensus: Ideas and advocacy coalitions around cash transfer programs in Brazil and Mexico.” Critical Policy Studies 13 (1): 23-42.
Tomazini Carla 2021 “Pioneering anti-poverty policies in Brazil and Mexico: Ambiguities and disagreements on conditional cash transfer programs.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 42 (1/2): 7–22.
Vieira Fabiola Sulpino, Benevides Rodrigo Pucci de Sá e 2016 “Os Impactos do novo regime fiscal para o financiamento do sistema único de saúde e para a efetivação do direito à saúde no Brasil. Nota Técnica n. 28.” Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea). https://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/nota_tecnica/160920_nt_28_disoc.pdf.

Biographies

Carla Tomazini is Associate Professor in Political Science at Sciences Po Lyon and a member of the multidisciplinary joint research unit ‘Triangle’. She is also an Honorary Research Fellow at the IAS, University of Warwick. She was a Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellow (SIF-COFUND) at the University of Warwick. Kimberly Bolch holds a DPhil in International Development from the University of Oxford. The research for this article was conducted in the context of her doctoral studies.