Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Review article
First published online December 7, 2024

Bioethics and Controversies in the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Cosmetic Surgery

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have become an essential part of modern medicine and surgery in recent years. Potential cosmetic surgery patients can visualize possible outcomes of a surgical procedure with the swipe of a finger and get a quote for surgical treatments without leaving their homes. Most of these AI tools use high-quality 2D or 3D photographs, as well as sensitive personal data regarding medical history and other important parameters, which certainly raise concerns about the bioethical aspects, accountability, and personal data protection. This article points out the key ethical principles and issues that may arise in the implementation of these tools, especially in facial cosmetic surgery. It discusses the possible pre-programmed bias and other considerations and controversies that can lead to unintentional violation of sensitive information and resulting legal issues. A search was performed across PubMed and Web of Science, using a combination of keywords related to “cosmetic surgery” and “artificial intelligence,” such as “bioethics,” “AI preprogrammed bias,” and “AI liability.” The search was focused on published articles in the past 5 years to point out the recent trends and opinions among plastic cosmetic surgeons about the use of AI in the field. The main potential issues associated with the use of AI in plastic cosmetic surgery were summarized as “Possible pre-programmed Bias,” “Key ethical principles” and “Other considerations and controversies,” such as compromised traditional patient-clinician relationships, including loss of empathy and patient-centered care. Further considerations include the potential dehumanization of health care, AI-generated threats to patients’ safety and efficacy, and limited liability. The current experts’ opinions regarding the use of AI in cosmetic surgery and health care seem to be very controversial despite the increase in its use and the recent improvements in the quality and versatile facets of AI tools and their implementation. There are supporters and opponents, whose common goal remains to be the quality of care, patient safety, and bioethics, including data protection and liability. Artificial intelligence technologies can potentially improve patient care by supporting surgeons without having to replace them. Strict regulations are crucial for any kind of AI technology, especially the one involved in direct patient care, such as cosmetic surgery.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Bassiri-Tehrani B, Cress PE. Unleashing the power of ChatGPT: revolutionizing plastic surgery and beyond. Aesthet Surg J. 2023;43:1395-1399.
2. Aktas EH, Balci UD, Karacaoglu E. COVID pandemic aftermath: changing dynamics on cosmetic and aesthetic surgery demands. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(4):1658-1665.
3. Rokhshad R, Keyhan SO, Yousefi P. Artificial intelligence applications and ethical challenges in oral and maxillo-facial cosmetic surgery: a narrative review. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;45(1):14.
4. Sue GR. Artificial intelligence for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11(6):e5057.
5. Giglio AD, Costa MUPD. The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native English speakers. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2023;69(9):e20230560.
6. Mir MA. Artificial intelligence revolutionizing plastic surgery scientific publications. Cureus. 2023;15(6):e40770.
7. Salvagno M, Taccone FS, Gerli AG. Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Crit Care. 2023;27(1):75.
8. Zuo KJ, Saun TJ, Forrest CR. Facial recognition technology: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(6):1298e-1306e.
9. Bouguila J, Khochtali H. Facial plastic surgery and face recognition algorithms: Interaction and challenges. A scoping review and future directions. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;121(6):696-703.
10. Koimizu J, Numajiri T, Kato K. Machine learning and ethics in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(3):e2162.
11. Ntoutsi E, Fafalios P, Gadiraju U, et al. Bias in data-driven artificial intelligence systems: an introductory survey. Wires Data Mining Knowl Disc. 2020;10:e1356.
12. Chandawarkar A, Chartier C, Kanevsky J, Cress PE. A practical approach to artificial intelligence in plastic surgery. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2020;2(1):ojaa001.
13. Varkey B. Principles of clinical ethics and their application to practice. Med Princ Pract. 2021;30(1):17-28.
14. World Health O. Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health: WHO Guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
15. Farhud DD, Zokaei S. Ethical issues of artificial intelligence in medicine and healthcare. Iran J Public Health. 2021;50(11):i-v.
16. Xie Y, Seth I, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM, Ross R, Lee M. Aesthetic surgery advice and counseling from artificial intelligence: a rhinoplasty consultation with ChatGPT. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47:1985-1993.
17. Spoer DL, Kiene JM, Dekker PK, et al. A systematic review of artificial intelligence applications in plastic surgery: looking to the future. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022;10(12):e4608.
18. Jarvis NR, Jarvis T, Morris BE, et al. A scoping review of mobile apps in plastic surgery: patient care, trainee education, and professional development. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11(4):e4943.
19. Goldhahn J, Rampton V, Spinas GA. Could artificial intelligence make doctors obsolete? BMJ. 2018;363:k4563.
20. Halpern J. What is clinical empathy? J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(8):670-674.
21. Bauchat J, Seropian M, Jeffries P. Communication and empathy in the patient-centered care model: why simulation-based training is not optional. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12:356-359.
22. Bodenstedt S, Wagner M, Müller-Stich BP, Weitz J, Speidel S. Artificial intelligence-assisted surgery: potential and challenges. Visc Med. 2020;36(6):450-455.
23. Kelley JM, Kraft-Todd G, Schapira L, Kossowsky J, Riess H. The influence of the patient-clinician relationship on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4):e94207.
24. Farid Y, Fernando Botero Gutierrez L, Ortiz S, et al. Artificial intelligence in plastic surgery: insights from plastic surgeons, education integration, ChatGPT’s survey predictions, and the path forward. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12(1):e5515.
25. Koljonen V. What could we make of AI in plastic surgery education. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023;81:94-96.
26. Guni A, Varma P, Zhang J, Fehervari M, Ashrafian H. Artificial intelligence in surgery: the future is now [published online ahead of print January 22, 2024]. Eur Surg Res.
27. Ahuja AS. The impact of artificial intelligence in medicine on the future role of the physician. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7702.
28. Khullar D, Casalino LP, Qian Y, Lu Y, Krumholz HM, Aneja S. Perspectives of patients about artificial intelligence in health care. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(5):e2210309.
29. Kerasidou A. Artificial intelligence and the ongoing need for empathy, compassion and trust in healthcare. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98(4):245-250.
30. Abdelhady AM, Davis CR. Plastic surgery and artificial intelligence: how ChatGPT improved operation note accuracy, time, and education. Mayo Clin Proc: Digit Health. 2023;1(3):299-308.

Biographies

Nikoletta Vargas, DMD, MS, PhD, Incoming Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA; currently US ARMY, MEDDAC, Maryland, USA.
Daria Hamrah DMD, FAACS, FADSA, Fellowship Director, Facial Cosmetic Surgery, NOVA SurgiCare, PC, Washington Hospital Center, Mc Lean, VA, USA.