Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published May 2002
Request permissions

Manufacturing of Doubly Curved Tubular Composite Structures: Mapping and Weave Modifications

Shrikant B. Sharma, Isaac Porat, […], Prasad Potluri, and John Atkinson+1View all authors and affiliations
Volume 15, Issue 3
https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705702015003448

Abstract

The versatility of the textile weaving process has made it a popular method for producing structural composite preforms. Enhanced through-thickness strength by multi-layer weaving, good in-plane strength and the ability to produce 2.5D or 3D shapes, are some of the advantages which have made weaving the most commonly used textile process for composite applications. It is also possible to incorporate local modifications to the weave patterns and fibre-densities within the woven structure; although this characteristic of weaving has not been completely exploited by the composites industry. It is easy to produce a tubular structure having good bi-directional mechanical properties. Moreover, the preform also can be molded into bent shapes, making the woven composites more versatile than ever before. Drape behavior of such tubular fabrics is complex and has not previously been investigated. The aim of this paper is to discuss the manufacturing aspects of such tubular preforms and to suggest ways to overcome the wrinkling problems using the mapping results.
In terms of the mapping models, existing shear-based algorithms for mapping a flat fabric over open surfaces are first applied to a closed tubular section. Specific algorithms are developed to map a straight tubular preform over a bent tubular section. Wrinkles are prevalent in sections with severe bends and the paper also discusses methods to remove them.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

1. Zhao, L., Porat, I. and Greenwood, K. (1996). The computerised weaving of preforms for composites part I: Flattening of 3-dimensional performs. J. Text. Inst., 87: 183.
Crossref
Web of Science
Google Scholar
2. Greenwood, K., Zhao, L. and Porat, I. (1996). The computerised weaving of preforms for composites part II: Feature analysis of the flattened structures. J. Text. Inst., 87: 195.
Crossref
Web of Science
Google Scholar
3. Mack, C. and Taylor, H.M. (1956). The fitting of woven cloth to surfaces. J. Text. Inst., 47: T477.
Crossref
Google Scholar
4. Robertson, R.E., Hsiue, H.S., Sickafus, E.N. and Yeh, G.S.Y. (1981). Fibre rearrangements during the modeling of continuous fibre composites part I: Flat cloth to a hemisphere. Polymer Composites, 2(3): 26.
Crossref
Google Scholar
5. Van West, B.P., Pipes, R.B. and Keefe, M. (1990). A simulation of the draping of bidirectional fabrics over arbitrary surfaces. J. Text. Inst., 81(4): 448-460.
Crossref
Web of Science
Google Scholar
6. Van Der Weeen, F. (1991). Algorithms for draping fabrics on doubly-curved surfaces. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 31: 1415-1426.
Crossref
Web of Science
Google Scholar
7. Sharma, S.B., Potluri, P. and Porat, I. (1999). Moulding analysis of 3D woven composite preforms: mapping algorithms. Presented at the twelfth International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM-12), Paris, France, July 5-9.
Google Scholar
8. Mazumdar, S.K. and Hoa, S.V. (1995). Analytical models for low cost manufacturing of composite components by filament winding, part I: direct kinematics. Journal of Composite Materials, 29(11): 1515-1541.
Crossref
Web of Science
Google Scholar
9. Potluri, P., Francke, M. and Day, R.J. (2000). Flexural and torsional properties of biaxial and triaxial braided composites for compliant systems. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Composite Materials (ECCM 9). Brighton, UK. June.
Google Scholar
10. Sharma, S.B., Potluri, P., Atkinson, J. and Porat, I. (26th October 2000). Mapping of tubular woven composite preforms onto doubly curved surfaces. Acccepted for publication in Computer Aided Design.
Google Scholar
11. Mortenson, M.E. (1997). Geometric Modeling, 2nd Edn. New York: Wiley Computer Publishing.
Google Scholar
12. Marhl, M., Guid, N., Oblonsek, C. and Horvat, M. (1996). Extensions of sweep surface constructions. Computers and Graphics, 20(6): 93-903.
Crossref
Web of Science
Google Scholar
13. Sharma, S.B., Potluri, P., Atkinson, J. and Porat, I. (2000). Optimisation algorithms for mapping 3D woven composite preforms. In: Proceedings of the CAPE 2000 Conference, IMechE Professional Engineering Publishing Limited, UK.
Google Scholar

Also from Sage