Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online August 14, 2020
Request permissions

Agricultural Mechanization in India: A Study on the Ownership and Investment in Farm Machinery by Cultivator Households across Agro-ecological Regions

Anupam Sarkar [email protected]View all authors and affiliations
Volume 11, Issue 2
https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399620925440

Abstract

Despite the signs of distress and fatigue in Indian agriculture, the use of machines in crop operations has increased manifold in recent times. Proponents of mechanization argue that mechanization saves time and cost, and improves agricultural productivity. The Government of India has also encouraged mechanization through subsiding farm machinery and establishing custom hiring centres. Earlier studies have found significant regional variation in the spread of agricultural mechanization. Cost of cultivation data collected by Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) reveal that although the share of machine labour in the cost of cultivation per hectare has increased, there exist significant differences across crops in the use of mechanical input. Empirical studies in different regions have found a significant presence of the rental market for services of agricultural machinery. However, in recent years there have been very few studies on the patterns of mechanization based on household-level data on ownership and investment in agricultural machinery and implements. Agro-ecological characteristics of a region are said to have a significant impact on the level of mechanization. Ownership of machinery is also significantly influenced by the factors such as size of landholding, access to irrigation and access to institutional credit. The pattern of investment and ownership of machinery has important implications on the profitability of farming. This article uses unit-level data from the All-India Debt and Investment Survey (NSS 70th round 2013) to study the pattern of agricultural mechanization in India based on the ownership of agricultural machinery and implements. Using ownership and expenditure data it studies the questions of recent patterns in agricultural mechanization across agro-ecological regions and land classes.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

Agarwal B. (1983). Mechanisation in Indian agriculture. Allied Publishers.
Google Scholar
Biggs S., Justice S., & Lewis D. (2011). Patterns of rural mechanisation, energy and employment in south Asia: Reopening the debate. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(9), 78–82.
Google Scholar
Binswanger H. P. (1978). The economics of tractors in south Asia. ICRISAT.
Google Scholar
Binswanger H. P. (1986). Agricultural mechanisation: A comparative historical perspective. The World Bank Research Observer, 1(1), 27–56
Crossref
Google Scholar
Binswanger H. P. (1987). Agricultural mechanisation: Issues and options. The World Bank.
Google Scholar
Bhalla G. S., & Singh G. (2001). Indian agriculture: Four decades of development. SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar
Bhalla G. S. (2007). Indian agriculture since independence. National Book Trust of India.
Google Scholar
Bhalla G. S., & Singh G. (2012). Economic liberalisation and Indian agriculture: A district level study. Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Bhattarai M., Singh G., Takeshima H., & Shekhawat R. S. (2018). Farm machinery use and agricultural industries in India: Status, evolution, implications, and lessons learned (Discussion Paper No. 01715). Development Strategy and Governance Division, International Food Policy Research Institute.
Google Scholar
Chavan P., & Ramakumar R. (2008, December). Debt and assets of rural households in India: a note on the primary and secondary sources of data. Paper presented at Studying Village Economies in India: A Colloquium on Methodology, West Bengal, India.
Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers, Welfare (DoACFW) (2018). Pocket book of agricultural statistics, 2017. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
Google Scholar
Directorate of Economics and Statistics (2017). State of Indian agriculture 2017. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India
Google Scholar
Gifford R. C. (1981). Agricultural mechanisation in development: Guidelines for strategy formulation. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin No. 45. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome.
Google Scholar
Gollin D., Morris M., & Byerlee D. (2005). Technology adoption in intensive post-Green Revolution systems. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(5), 1310–1316.
Crossref
Web of Science
Google Scholar
Grant Thornton (2017). Mechanisation: Key to higher productivity to double farmers’ income. Grant Thornton India. https://www.grantthornton.in/insights/articles/mechanisation-key-to-higher-productivity-to-double-farmers-income/
Google Scholar
Griffin K. (1974). Political economy of agrarian change. Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Gupta S. K. (2008). Farm mechanisation: Minimising labour drudgery. In Ram N. (Ed.), The Hindu survey of Indian agriculture (pp. 113–116). Kasturi & Sons Limited.
Google Scholar
Hazell Peter B. R. (2009). Transforming agriculture: The Green Revolution in Asia. In Spielman D. J., & Pandya-Lorch R. (Eds.), Millions fed: Proven successes in agricultural development (Chapter 3, pp. 25–32). International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
Google Scholar
Herdt R. W. (1986). Mechanisation of rice production in developing Asian countries: Perspective evidence and issues. In Wicks J. A., Lingard J., Nelson G., Webster J. P. G., & Hettel G. P. (Eds.), Consequences of small farm mechanisation (pp. 1–13). International Rice Research Institute.
Google Scholar
IFPRI (2016). Mechanisation in Eastern Gangetic Plains (EGP): A Review of Policies and Programmes with a focus on Indian EGP. Zero draft submitted to Sustainable and Resilient Farming Systems Intensification in Eastern Gangetic Plains (SRFSI). Author.
Google Scholar
International Labour Organisation (ILO) (2018). Future of work for tea smallholders in Sri Lanka. Author.
Google Scholar
Jayadev A., Motiram S., & Vakulabharanam V. (2007). Patterns of wealth disparities in India during liberalisation era. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(38), 3853–3863.
Google Scholar
Jodha N. S. (1974). A case of the process of tractorisation. Economic and Political Weekly, 9(52), A111–A118.
Google Scholar
Jose A. V. (1984). Farm mechanisation in Asian countries: Some perspective. Economic and Political Weekly, 19(26), A97–A103.
Google Scholar
Kahlon A. S. (1984). Modernisation of Punjab agriculture. Allied Publishers.
Google Scholar
Kumar A., & Singh D. K. (2008). Livestock production systems in India: An appraisal across agro-ecological regions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(4), 577–597.
Google Scholar
Kumara S. K., Weerakoddy R., & Epasinghe S. (2016). Mechanisation in other field crop sector: A situational analysis (Research Report No. 197). Hector Kobbekadwa Agrarian Research and Training Institute, Colombo.
Google Scholar
Ministry of Finance (2018). Agriculture and food management. In Economic Survey 2017–18 (Chapter 07, Volume II). Author.
Google Scholar
McInerney J. P., & Donaldson G. F. (1975). The consequences of farm tractors in Pakistan: An evaluation of IDA credits for financing the mechanisation of farms in Pakistan 1966–1970. The World Bank.
Google Scholar
McKinsey & Company (2013). India as an agriculture and high value food powerhouse: A new vision for 2030: Food and Agriculture Integrated Development Action (FAIDA) 3. Confederation of India Industry and McKinsey & Company.
Google Scholar
MoAFW (2015). Operational guidelines of sub-mission on agricultural mechanisation (Twelfth Five Year Plan). Mechnisation Technology Division, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation, and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
Google Scholar
Mottaleb K. A., Krupnik T. J., & Erenstein O. (2016). Factors associated with small scale agricultural machinery adoption in Bangladesh: Census findings’. Journal of Rural Studies, 46, 155–168.
Crossref
PubMed
Web of Science
Google Scholar
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural, Development (NABARD) (2018). Sectoral paper-farm mechanisation. Farm Sector Policy Department, NABARD.
Google Scholar
National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER) (1980). Implication of tractorisation for farm employment, productivity and income (Vol. I and II). Author.
Google Scholar
National Sample Survey Office (2014). All India Debt and Investment, Survey (AIDIS), January- December 2013, NSS 70th round, Schedule 18.2. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.
Google Scholar
National Sample Survey Organisation (2003). All India Debt and Investment, Survey (AIDIS), January- December 2003, NSS 59th round, Schedule 18.2. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.
Google Scholar
Ojha T. P. (1988). Farm mechanisation: Need for a long term policy. In Kasturi G. (Ed.), The Hindu survey of Indian agriculture (pp. 151–152). Kasturi & Sons Limited.
Google Scholar
Pingali P. (2007). Agricultural mechanisation: Adoption patterns and economic impact. In Evension R. E., & Pingali P. (Eds.), Handbook of agricultural economics (Vol. 3; Chapter 54; pp. 2779–2805). Elseviar.
Google Scholar
Pingali V. (2004). Agricultural implements. In Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India (Ed.), State of Indian farmer—A millennium study series (Vol. 8; pp. 243–384). Input management, Academic Foundation.
Google Scholar
Raghavan M. (2008). Changing pattern of input use and cost of cultivation. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(26), 123–129.
Google Scholar
Rao C. H. H. (1972). Farm mechanisation in a labour abundant economy. Economic and Political Weekly, 7(5/7), 393–400.
Google Scholar
Rao M. J. (1997). Agricultural development under state planning. In Byres T. J. (Ed.), The state, development planning and liberalisation in India. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Ray A. K. (1993). The present status of agricultural mechanisation and its constraints. Agricultural Situation in India, 4(48), 245–250.
Google Scholar
Rehman T., Khan M. U., Tayyab M., Muhamad W. A., & Muhammad F. (2016). Current status and overview of farm mechanisation in Pakistan-a review. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 18(2), 83–93.
Google Scholar
Rudra A. (1992). The green revolution strategy. In Political economy of Indian agriculture. K. P. Bagchi and Company.
Google Scholar
Satyasai K. J. S., & Balnarayana M. (2018). Can mechanisation in agriculture help achieving sustainable development goals? Agricultural Economics Research Review, 31, 147–156.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Sidhu R. S., & Vatta K. (2012). Improving economic viabilty of farming: A study of cooperative agro machinery service centres in Punjab. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 25, 427–434.
Google Scholar
Singh B., & Singh K. (1983, May). Demand for tractors in Punjab. Agricultural Situation in India, 63–72.
Google Scholar
Singh G. (2015). Agricultural mechanisation development in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(1), 64–82.
Google Scholar
Singh S. (2010). Agricultural machinery industry in India: A study of growth, market structure, and business strategies (CMA Publication No. 230). Centre for Management in Agriculture, Indian Institute of Management.
Google Scholar
Singh S. (2018). Farm machinery rental services: Case studies from Punjab. In Institutional innovations in the delivery of farm services in India: A smallholder perspective (CMA Publication No. 251). Springer.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Singh S., Kingra H. S., & Sangeet (2013). Custom hiring services of farm machinery in Punjab: Impact and policies. Indian Research Journal of Extention Education, 13(2), 45–50.
Google Scholar
Sirohi S. (1999). Draught power in Indian agriculture: An analysis of trends, composition and determinants (Unpublished PhD thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
Google Scholar
Subramanian S., & Jayaraj D. (2012). India’s wealth distribution data: A critical assessment. Indian Journal of Human Development, 3(2), 265–281.
Crossref
Google Scholar
Takeshima H. (2016). Custom hired tractor services and returns to scale in smallholder agriculture: A production function approach. Agricultural Economics, 48 (2016), 1–10.
Google Scholar
Takeshima H. (2017). overview of the Evolution of agricultural mechanisation in Nepal—A focus on tractors and combine harvesters (IFPRI Discussion Paper 01662). Development Strategy and Governance Division, International Food Policy Research Institute.
Google Scholar
Thulasamma L. (2003, 17–20 December). Investment in agriculture: Trends and issues. Paper presented in All India Conference on Agriculture and Rural Society in Contemporary India, Barddhaman.
Google Scholar
Tiwari P. S., Gurung T. R., Sahni R. K., & Kumar V. (2017). Agricultural mechanisation trends in SAARC region. In Gurung T. R., Kabir W., & Bokhtiar S. M. (Eds.), Mechanisation for sustainable agricultural intensification in SAARC region. SAARC Agriculture Centre and Krishi Gobeshona Foundation.
Google Scholar
Vaidyanathan A. (2010). Agricultural growth in India: Role of technology, incentives and institutions. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Yang J., Huang Z., Zhang X., & Reardon T. (2013). the rapid rise of cross regional agricultural mechanisation services in China. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(5), 1245–1251.
Crossref
Web of Science
Google Scholar
|

Also from Sage