Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals

Abstract

Background:

There continues to be controversy regarding the optimal fixation strategy of large posterior malleolar fractures while treating trimalleolar ankle fractures. This study compared the biomechanical stability in a cadaveric model of a modified anterior-posterior (AP) 4-screw construct vs posterior plate fixation of Mason 2A posterior malleolar fractures.

Methods:

Twenty fresh frozen human cadaveric below-knee specimens were prepared with an oblique osteotomy of the posterior malleolus, resection of medial and lateral ankle ligaments, and posterior dislocation of the tibiotalar joint to produce unstable Mason 2A posterior malleolar fractures. Specimens were fixed with either a modified AP 4-screw construct or with a 5-hole one-third tubular plate with 4 cortical screws. The specimens were axially loaded in neutral ankle position for 50 000 cycles to simulate protected weightbearing, then loaded to failure in 20 degrees of plantarflexion. Fracture displacement and load to failure were recorded.

Results:

Two specimens from the plate group had early failure with displacement at the fracture site >2 mm; otherwise, there was no difference in displacement between the 2 constructs after axial cyclic loading (screws, 1.32 ± 0.26 mm vs plate, 1.26 ± 0.48 mm, P = .82). Additionally, there was no difference in the load to failure (screws, 3856 ± 617 N vs plate, 3939 ± 569 N, P = .81). Maximum load to failure was statistically equivocal between the 2 constructs (screws, 4867 ± 718 N vs plate, 4862 ± 1020 N, P = .99).

Conclusion:

For the fixation of large, unstable Mason 2A posterior malleolar fractures involving roughly 50% of the articular surface, our modified AP 4-screw construct may offer similar biomechanical stability while avoiding prone positioning and additional posterior surgical exposures associated with posterior plating.

Clinical Relevance:

This cadaveric study demonstrates that a modified anterior-posterior 4-screw construct provides biomechanical stability equivalent to posterior plating for large posterior malleolar fractures.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Data availability statement

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

1. Anwar A, Hu Z, Adnan A, et al. Comprehensive biomechanical analysis of three clinically used fixation constructs for posterior malleolar fractures using cadaveric and finite element analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18639.
2. Anwar A, Lv D, Zhao Z, et al. Finite element analysis of the three different posterior malleolus fixation strategies in relation to different fracture sizes. Injury. 2017;48(4):825-832.
3. Anwar A, Zhang Z, Lv D, et al. Biomechanical efficacy of AP, PA lag screws and posterior plating for fixation of posterior malleolar fractures: a three dimensional finite element study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):73.
4. Beckenkamp PR, Lin CWC, Engelen L, Moseley AM. Reduced physical activity in people following ankle fractures: a longitudinal study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(4):235-242.
5. Bennett C, Behn A, Daoud A, et al. Buttress plating versus anterior-to-posterior lag screws for fixation of the posterior malleolus: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(12):664-669.
6. Bois AJ, Dust W. Posterior fracture dislocation of the ankle: technique and clinical experience using a posteromedial surgical approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(9):629-636.
7. Clanton TO, Williams BT, Backus JD, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the individual ligament contributions to syndesmotic stability. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(1):66-75.
8. Dehghan N, McKee MD, Jenkinson RJ, et al. Early weightbearing and range of motion versus non-weightbearing and immobilization after open reduction and internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(7):345-352.
9. Duan X, Kadakia AR. Operative treatment of posterior malleolar fractures. Open Orthop J. 2017;11(1):732-742.
10. Fan ZY, Shu LY, Jin YZ, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of compression buttress screw and medial plate fixation for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures. Injury. 2022;53(12):3887-3893.
11. Guan M, Zhao J, Kuang Y, Li G, Tan J. Finite element analysis of the effect of sagittal angle on ankle joint stability in posterior malleolus fracture: a cohort study. Int J Surg. 2019;70:53-59.
12. Guedes LA, Alves YC, Heluy GD, de Oliveira AC, Mezencio AC, Kobata SI. Early complications rates after ankle fracture with posterior malleolus fracture. J Foot Ankle. 2025;19(1).
13. Haraguchi N, Armiger RS, Campbell JT, Keyurapan E, Kitagawa M, Chao EY. Posterior malleolus load-bearing characteristics as a function of ankle position and fracture pattern. 2005. Accessed May 13, 2025. https://www.ors.org/transactions/51/0509.pdf
14. Hartwich K, Lorente Gomez A, Pyrc J, Gut R, Rammelt S, Grass R. Biomechanical analysis of stability of posterior antiglide plating in osteoporotic pronation abduction ankle fracture model with posterior tibial fragment. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(1):58-65.
15. Heeran N, Gomaa AR, Mason L, Bond AP. The arterial risk posed by the posterolateral approach: an anatomical cadaveric study of the fibular artery and its variability. Clin Anat. 2024;37(8):840-848.
16. Kohler FC, Schenk P, Koehler P, et al. The role of the posterior malleolus in the treatment of unstable upper ankle joint injuries - a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;28(7):979-985.
17. Koval KJ, Lurie J, Zhou W, et al. Ankle fractures in the elderly: what you get depends on where you live and who you see. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(9):635-639.
18. Kwee MM, Ho YH, Rozen WM. The prone position during surgery and its complications: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines. Int Surg. 2015;100(2):292-303.
19. Mansur H, Lucas PPA, Vitorino RC, et al. Biomechanical comparison of four different posterior malleolus fixation techniques: a finite element analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;28(5):570-577.
20. Mertens M, Wouters J, Kloos J, Nijs S, Hoekstra H. Functional outcome and general health status after plate osteosynthesis of posterior malleolus fractures - the quest for eligibility. Injury. 2020;51(4):1118-1124.
21. Pachi A, Ji T. Frequency and velocity of people walking. Struct Eng. 2005;83(3):36-40. Accessed May 13, 2025. https://trid.trb.org/View/750847
22. Scheidt KB, Stiehl JB, Skrade DA, Barnhardt T. Posterior malleolar ankle fractures: an in vitro biomechanical analysis of stability in the loaded and unloaded states. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6(1):96-101.
23. Stake IK, Bryniarski AR, Brady AW, et al. Effect of posterior malleolar fixation on syndesmotic stability. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(4):997-1006.
24. Stake IK, Douglass BW, Husebye EE, Clanton TO. Methods for biomechanical testing of posterior malleolar fractures in ankle fractures: a scoping review. Foot Ankle Int. 2023;44(4):348-362.
25. Talbot M, Steenblock TR, Cole PA. Posterolateral approach for open reduction and internal fixation of trimalleolar ankle fractures. Can J Surg. 2005;48(6):487-490.
26. Tan EW, Sirisreetreerux N, Paez AG, Parks BG, Schon LC, Hasenboehler EA. Early weightbearing after operatively treated ankle fractures: a biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(6):652-658.
27. Tavares CMdP, Castilho RS, Lopes FAS, Baumfeld DS, Silva TAA, Pinto RZdA. Incidence of early complications in the posterolateral approach to posterior malleolus fractures. J Foot Ankle. 2020;14(2):178-182.
28. Testa EJ, Walsh D, Patel D, et al. Supination adduction vertical medial malleolar fracture fixation with buttress plating vs a novel screw-only construct: a cadaveric biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 2022;43(6):810-817.
29. The underappreciated dangers of the prone position. Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation. 2024. Accessed May 13, 2025. https://www.apsf.org/article/the-underappreciated-dangers-of-the-prone-position/
30. Vetter SY, Palesche N, Beisemann N, et al. Influence of syndesmotic injuries and posterior malleolar ankle fractures on fibula position in the ankle joint: a cadaveric study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021;47(4):905-912.
31. Wang X, Yin J, Zhang C, et al. Biomechanical study of screw fixation and plate fixation of a posterior malleolar fracture in a simulation of the normal gait cycle. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(10):1132-1138.
32. Wang Z, Sun J, Yan J, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of posterior-anterior screws, anterior-posterior screws and a posterior-anterior plate in the fixation of posterior malleolar fractures with a fragment size of ≥15 and <15%. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):570.
33. Yildirim C, Demirel M, Karahan G, et al. Biomechanical comparison of four different fixation methods in the management of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: is there a clear winner? Injury. 2022;53(10):3124-3129.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.