Therapeutic alliance in videoconferencing psychotherapy compared to psychotherapy in person: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction
Videoconferencing psychotherapy (VCP) delivers treatment to individuals with limited access to face-to-face mental healthcare. VCP's effectiveness has been demonstrated for various disorders and therapeutic interventions. However, there is contradictory evidence regarding the therapeutic alliance in VCP as compared to psychotherapy in person (PIP). This meta-analysis examines whether therapeutic alliance differs by psychotherapy's delivery format, namely VCP versus PIP.
Methods
We searched five databases for trials comparing the therapeutic alliance in VCP and PIP, wherein the therapeutic alliance was rated by either patients or therapists or both. Eighteen publications were included, and the difference between VCP and PIP was assessed. Furthermore, we tested possible moderators of the difference in therapeutic alliance between VCP and PIP by meta-regression, and we assessed the risk of bias of this meta-analysis.
Results
The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the therapeutic alliance between VCP and PIP for alliance ratings by patients (SMD = −0.09; 95% CI = −0.26; 0.07) as well as by therapists (SMD = 0.04; 95% CI = −0.17; 0.25). No significant moderators were found.
Discussion
In this meta-analysis, VCP and PIP did not differ with respect to the therapeutic alliance as rated by either patients or therapists. Further research is required into mechanisms driving the therapeutic alliance in VCP and PIP.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Backhaus A, Agha Z, Maglione ML, et al. Videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review. Psychol Serv 2012 May; 9: 111–131.
2. Simpson S, Reid CL. Therapeutic alliance in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A review. Aust J Rural Health 2014 Dec; 22: 280–299.
3. World Health Organization. The impact of COVID-19 on mental, neurological and substance use services: results of a rapid assessment. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 26]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/335838.
4. Yuen EK, Herbert JD, Forman EM, et al. Acceptance based behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder through videoconferencing. J Anxiety Disord 2013 May; 27: 389–397.
5. Mitchell JE, Crosby RD, Wonderlich SA, et al. A randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cognitive–behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa delivered via telemedicine versus face-to-face. Behav Res Ther 2008 May; 46: 581–592.
6. Morland LA, Mackintosh MA, Rosen CS, et al. Telemedicine versus in-person delivery of cognitive processing therapy for women with posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized noninferiority trial. Depress Anxiety 2015; 32: 811–820.
7. Yuen EK, Gros DF, Price M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of home-based telehealth versus in-person prolonged exposure for combat-related PTSD in veterans: Preliminary results. J Clin Psychol 2015; 71: 500–512.
8. Bouchard S, Paquin B, Payeur R, et al. Delivering cognitive-behavior therapy for panic disorder with agoraphobia in videoconference. Telemed J E Health 2004 Mar; 10: 13–25.
9. Himle JA, Fischer DJ, Muroff JR, et al. Videoconferencing-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behav Res Ther 2006 Dec 1; 44: 1821–1829.
10. Simpson S, Guerrini L, Rochford S. Telepsychology in a university psychology clinic setting: A pilot project. Aust Psychol 2015; 50: 285–291.
11. Chavooshi B, Mohammadkhani P, Dolatshahee B. Telemedicine vs in-person delivery of intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy for patients with medically unexplained pain: A 12-month randomized, controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 2017 Jan; 23: 133–141.
12. Ardito RB, Rabellino D. Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: Historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Front Psychol 2011; 2: 270
13. Flückiger C, Del Re AC, Wampold BE,. et al. The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy 2018; 55: 316–340.
14. Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Flückiger C,. et al. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy 2011; 48: 9–16.
15. Horvath AO, Symonds BD. Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. J Couns Psychol 1991; 38: 139–149.
16. Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68: 438–450.
17. Berger T. The therapeutic alliance in internet interventions: A narrative review and suggestions for future research. Psychother Res 2017 Sep 3; 27: 511–524.
18. Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, ResPract 1979; 16: 252–260.
19. Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. J Couns Psychol 1989; 36: 223–233.
20. Glueckauf RL, Fritz SP, Ecklund-Johnson EP,. et al. Videoconferencing-based family counseling for rural teenagers with epilepsy: Phase 1 findings. Rehabil Psychol 2002 Feb; 47: 49–72.
21. Greene CJ, Morland LA, Macdonald A,. et al. How does tele-mental health affect group therapy process? Secondary analysis of a noninferiority trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010; 78: 746–750.
22. Rees CS, Stone S. Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face versus videoconferenced psychotherapy. Prof Psychol: Res Pract 2005 Dec; 36: 649–653.
23. Germain V, Marchand A, Bouchard S,. et al. Assessment of the therapeutic alliance in face-to-face or videoconference treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Networking 2010 Feb; 13: 29–35.
24. Wehmann E, Köhnen M, Härter M,. et al. Therapeutic alliance in technology-based interventions for the treatment of depression: Systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e17195–e17195.
25. Simpson S, Deans G, Brebner E. The delivery of a tele-psychology service to shetland. Clin Psychol Psychother 2001; 8: 130–135.
26. Simpson S, Bell L, Knox J,. et al. Therapy via videoconferencing: A route to client empowerment? Clin Psychol Psychother 2005; 12: 156–165.
27. Watts S, Marchand A, Bouchard S, et al. Telepsychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder: Impact on the working alliance. J Psychother Integr 2020 Jun; 30: 208–225.
28. Norwood C, Moghaddam NG, Malins S,. et al. Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review and noninferiority meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Psychother 2018 Nov; 25: 797–808.
29. Safran JD, Muran JC. Resolving therapeutic alliance ruptures: Diversity and integration. J Clin Psychol 2000; 56: 233–243.
30. Connolly SL, Miller CJ, Lindsay JA,. et al. A systematic review of providers’ attitudes toward telemental health via videoconferencing. Clin Psychol: Sci Pract 2020; 27: e12311.
31. Horowitz MSA. An exploratory study of therapist perceptions of the differences in therapeutic alliance between videoconference therapy and face-to-face therapy. 74. US: Fielding Graduate University, 2014.
32. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J,. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009 Oct; 62: 1006–1012.
33. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z,. et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016 Dec; 5: 210.
34. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2019. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119536604
35. Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M,. et al. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: Providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2004; 1: 176–184.
36. Döring N, Bortz J. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2016 [cited 2022 May 13], Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5.
37. R Development Core Team. a language and environment for statistical computing: reference index [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2010 [cited 2021 Mar 11]. Available from: http://www.polsci.wvu.edu/duval/PS603/Notes/R/fullrefman.pdf
38. R Studio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R [Internet]. Boston, MA, USA: RStudio Inc, 2020. Available from: http://www.rstudio.com/
39. Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 2010; 36: 1–48.
40. Balduzzi S, Rücker G, Schwarzer G. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: A practical tutorial. Evid Based Mental Health 2019; 22: 153–160.
41. Jelfs A, Richardson JTE. The use of digital technologies across the adult life span in distance education. Br J Educ Technol 2013; 44: 338–351.
42. Zickuhr K. Who’s not online and why. Pew Internet Am Life Project 2013 Sep. Available from: https://apo.org.au/node/35848
43. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br Med J 2008 Apr 26; 336: 924–926.
44. Penska K, Michael R, Messer SC,. et al. Therapeutic alliance building during the child psychiatric intake: Does VTC make a difference? Mil Med 2012 May; 177: 541–545.
45. Reese RJ, Mecham MR, Vasilj I, et al. The effects of telepsychology format on empathic accuracy and the therapeutic alliance: An analogue counselling session. Couns Psychother Res 2016 Dec; 16: 256–265.
46. Ştefan S, David D. Face-to-face counseling versus high definition holographic projection system efficacy and therapeutic alliance A brief research report. J Cogn Behav Psychother 2013 Sep; 13: 299–307.
47. Stevens A, Voore P. Pilot study of televideo psychiatric assessments in an underserviced community. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 783–785
48. Ertelt TW, Crosby RD, Marino JM,. et al. Therapeutic factors affecting the cognitive behavioral treatment of bulimia nervosa via telemedicine versus face-to-face delivery. Int J Eat Disord 2011 Dec; 44: 687–691.
49. King VL, Brooner RK, Peirce JM,. et al. A randomized trial of web-based videoconferencing for substance abuse counseling. J Subst Abuse Treat 2014 Jan; 46: 36–42.
50. Levy F, Leboucher P, Rautureau G,. et al. E-virtual reality exposure therapy in acrophobia: A pilot study. J Telemed Telecare 2016 Jun; 22: 215–220.
51. Stubbings DR, Rees CS, Roberts LD,. et al. Comparing in-person to videoconference-based cognitive behavioral therapy for mood and anxiety disorders: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: 169–184.
52. Wyler H, Liebrenz M, Ajdacic-Gross V, et al. Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions. BMC Psychiatry 2021 Dec; 21: 237.
53. Farabee D, Calhoun S, Veliz R. An experimental comparison of telepsychiatry and conventional psychiatry for parolees. Psychiatr Serv 2016; 67: 562–565.
54. Hungerbuehler I, Valiengo L, Loch AA,. et al. Home-based psychiatric outpatient care through videoconferencing for depression: A randomized controlled follow-up trial. JMIR Ment Health 2016; 3: e36.
55. Allard M, Bouchard S, Marchand A, L’efficacité de la psychothérapie pour le trouble panique en vidéoconférence: Réplication, et alliance thérapeutique = the efficacy of psychotherapy for panic disorders in videoconference: Replication and therapeutic alliance. Rev Qué Psychol 2007; 28: 43–64.
56. Bouchard S, Allard M, Robillard G, et al. Videoconferencing psychotherapy for panic disorder and agoraphobia: Outcome and treatment processes from a non-randomized non-inferiority trial. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 2164.
57. Netter AL, Hessler JB, Pfeuffer S, et al. Usability and naturalness of videoconference-based exposure and response prevention for obsessive–compulsive disorder at the patients’ homes: A pilot study. J Cogn Psychother 2018 Oct; 32: 303–314.
58. Morgan RD, Patrick AR, Magaletta PR. Does the use of telemental health alter the treatment experience? Inmates’ perceptions of telemental health versus face-to-face treatment modalities. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008 Feb; 76: 158–162.
59. Bouchard S, Dugas MJ, Belleville G, et al. A multisite non-inferiority randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy for generalized anxiety disorder delivered by videoconference. JCM 2022 Oct 7; 11: 5924.
60. Lopez A, Schwenk S, Schneck CD,. et al. Technology-based mental health treatment and the impact on the therapeutic alliance. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2019 Jul 8; 21: 76.
61. Cataldo F, Chang S, Mendoza A,. et al. A perspective on client-psychologist relationships in videoconferencing psychotherapy: Literature review. JMIR Ment Health 2021 Feb 19; 8: e19004.
62. Taylor T. Video conferencing us talking face-to-face: Is video suitable for supportive dialogue? Int J Ther Rehabil 2011; 18: 392–402.
63. Thorp SR, Fidler J, Moreno L,. et al. Lessons learned from studies of psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder via video teleconferencing. Psychol Serv 2012; 9: 197–199.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
Cite
Cite
Cite
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: March 28, 2023
Issue published: December 2024
Keywords
PubMed: 36974478
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.
View All Journal MetricsPublication usage*
Total views and downloads: 1406
*Publication usage tracking started in December 2016
Publications citing this one
Receive email alerts when this publication is cited
Web of Science: 30 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 32
- The therapeutic relationship in in‐person, video call, and telephone psychotherapy sessions
- Language of empathy in online counseling of a Global South university distance learning environment
- Telepsychotherapy and Mental Health Services
- Psychotherapy Research Trends During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Increase of Digital Therapy Uptake (2019–2023)
- Qualitative evaluation of a pilot mental health program for public safety personnel with post-traumatic stress disorder
- The competence paradox: when psychologists overestimate their understanding of Artificial Intelligence
- Facilitator perspectives on in-person versus videoconference delivery of a remedial intervention for impaired drivers: a qualitative study
- Mind Meets Machine: A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence Role in Clinical Psychology Practice
- Service User Views of Interpersonal Connections in a Videoconferencing Group Therapy Programme for Overcontrol
- Von Mails, Kamera bis hin zu Chatbots
- View More
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
