Sick building syndrome and its impacts on health, well-being and productivity: A systematic literature review
Abstract
People’s well-being, health and productivity in indoor environments are crucial areas of investigation, particularly concerning sick building syndrome (SBS). Sick building syndrome encompasses symptoms resulting from exposure to harmful factors associated with building use. Headaches, fatigue, malaise and nausea are amongst the complaints associated with SBS. A literature review was conducted, examining studies from Scopus and Web of Science to identify the major impacts of SBS on health, well-being and productivity. Out of 3601 initially identified articles, 134 were analyzed after applying predefined criteria. Three research questions (RQs) were formulated, leading to the following findings: (i) most studies focused on offices (35.48%), highlighting common respiratory symptoms that range from mild to severe based on individual sensitivity, indoor conditions and predictive factors; (ii) indoor air quality (IAQ) emerged as the primary factor influencing SBS, especially within the post-pandemic context. Increasing air circulation and ventilation are viable alternatives to enhance IAQ. (iii) Understanding SBS proves complex, with indications of potentially higher symptom frequencies in women due to historical factors, social roles, lower cold tolerance, limited understanding of female physiology and multiple chemical sensitivity.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Nakayama Y, Nakaoka H, Suzuki N, Tsumura K, Hanazato M, Todaka E, Mori C. Prevalence and risk factors of pre-sick building syndrome: characteristics of indoor environmental and individual factors. Environ Health Prev Med 2019; 24: 77.
2. Alwi NS, Hassim MH, Hamzah NA. Indoor air quality and sick building syndrome among garment manufacturing workers in Kota Bharu, Kelantan. Malaysian J Med Health Sci 2021; 17: 51–58.
3. Thach T-Q, Mahirah D, Dunleavy G, Nazeha N, Zhang Y, Tan CEH, Roberts AC, Christopoulos G, Soh CK, Car J. Prevalence of sick building syndrome and its association with perceived indoor environmental quality in an Asian multi-ethnic working population. Build Environ 2019; 166: 106420.
4. Binder LM, Campbell KA. Medically unexplained symptoms and neuropsychological assessment. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2004; 26: 369–392.
5. Nag PK. Sick building syndrome and other building-related illnesses. Design science and innovation. Singapore: Springer, 2018, pp. 53–103.
6. WHO. Indoor air pollutants: exposure and health effects, https://www.aivc.org/sites/default/files/airbase_1609.pdf (1982, accessed 09 May 2023). Online Referencing.
7. Teixeira DB, Brionizio JD, Pereira LJR, Mainier FB, Magro PPM, Nunes V, Lopes JC, Dias JC, Souza V, Ferraz FT, Belaidi H. Síndrome dos edifícios doentes em recintos com ventilação e climatização artificiais: revisão de literatura. In: Congresso Brasileiro de Defesa do Meio Ambiente 2005; 8.
8. Wang M, Li L, Hou C, Guo X, Fu H. Building and health: mapping the knowledge development of sick building syndrome. Buildings 2022; 12: 287.
9. Mendell MJ, Fisk WJ, Kreiss K, Levin H, Alexander D, Cain WS, Girman JR, Hines CJ, Jensen PA, Milton DK, Rexroat LP, Wallingford KM. Improving the health of workers in indoor environments: priority research needs for a national occupational research agenda. Am J Publ Health 2002; 92: 1430–1440.
10. Lu C-Y, Tsai M-C, Muo C-H, Kuo YH, Sung FC, Wu CC. Personal, psychosocial and environmental factors related to sick building syndrome in official employees of Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2017; 15: 7.
11. Nimlyat PS, Inusa YJ, Nanfel PK. A literature review of indoor air quality and sick building syndrome in office building design environment. Green Build & Constr Econ 2023; 4: 1–18.
12. Dhungana P, Chalise M. Prevalence of sick building syndrome symptoms and its associated factors among bank employees in Pokhara Metropolitan, Nepal. Indoor Air 2020; 30: 244–250.
13. Huo X, Sun Y, Hou J, Wang P, Kong X, Zhang Q, Sundell J. Sick building syndrome symptoms among young parents in Chinese homes. Build Environ 2020; 169: 106283.
14. WHO. Who guide to identifying the economic consequences of disease and injury. Geneva: World Health Organization, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/137037/9789241598293_eng.pdf (accessed 11 July 2023).
15. Boity AK, Kaur J, Varshney C. Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) in ill-lit and ill-ventilated buildings. ECS Trans 2022; 107: 9275–9283.
16. McGill G, Oyedele LO, McAllister K. An investigation of indoor air quality, thermal comfort and sick building syndrome symptoms in UK energy efficient homes. Smart Sustain Built Environ 2015; 4: 329–348.
17. Shan X, Zhou J, Chang VW-C, Yang EH. Comparing mixing and displacement ventilation in tutorial rooms: Students’ thermal comfort, sick building syndromes, and short-term performance. Build Environ 2016; 102: 128–137.
18. Meir IA, Schwartz M, Davara Y, Garb Y. A window of one’s own: a public office post-occupancy evaluation. Build Res Inf 2019; 47: 437–452.
19. Kalender Smajlović S, Kukec A, Dovjak M. Association between sick building syndrome and indoor environmental quality in Slovenian hospitals: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2019; 16: 3224.
20. Farrag N, Abou El-Ela MAS, Ezzeldin S. Sick building syndrome and office space design in Cairo, Egypt. Indoor Built Environ 2022; 31: 568–577.
21. Zainal ZA, Hashim Z, Jalaludin J, Lee LF, Hashim JH. Sick building syndrome among office workers in relation to office environment and indoor air pollutant at an academic institution, Malaysia. Malaysian J Med Health Sci 2019; 15: 126–134.
22. Baldan M, Manente S, Izzo FC. The role of bio-pollutants in the indoor air quality of old museum buildings: artworks biodeterioration as preview of human diseases. Environ Monit Assess 2021; 193: 787.
23. Kubba S. Indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Em: LEED v4 practices, certification, and accreditation handbook. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016, pp. 303–378.
24. Nieto-Márquez A, de Mateo M, Barrios A, García-Soto MMF, Narros A. Improving indoor air quality by using photocatalytic paints. Real scale study at the technical university of Madrid. Atmos Pollut Res 2023; 14: 101827.
25. Roh T, Moreno-Rangel A, Baek J, Obeng A, Hasan NT, Carrillo G. Indoor air quality and health outcomes in employees working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: a pilot study. Atmosphere 2021; 12: 1665.
26. Bangwal D, Suyal J, Kumar R. Hotel building design, occupants’ health and performance in response to COVID 19. Int J Hospit Manag 2022; 103: 103212.
27. Tagliabue LC, Re Cecconi F, Rinaldi S, Ciribini ALC. Data driven indoor air quality prediction in educational facilities based on IoT network. Energy Build 2021; 236: 110782.
28. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010; 8: 336–341.
29. Silva JS, Fernandes MA. Discusión del síndrome del edificio enfermo en trabajadores de la salud. Rev Cuba de Enf 2020; 36: 1–16.
30. Kalender Smajlović S, Dovjak M, Kukec A. Pogostnost sindroma bolnih stavb v bolnišnicah v povezavi z okoljskimi dejavniki. Slov Nurs Rev 2019; 53: 221–231.
31. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of pubmed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. Faseb J 2008; 22: 338–342.
32. Zamboni AB, Thommazo AD, Hernandes ECM, Fabbri SCPF. StArt uma ferramenta computacional de apoio à revisão sistemática. Proc.: Congresso Brasileiro de Software (CBSoft’10), Salvador, Brazil. UFBA, 2010, pp. 91–96.
33. Kuzior A, Sira M. A bibliometric analysis of blockchain technology research using VOSviewer. Sustainability 2022; 14: 8206.
34. Molina C, Aiache J-M, Caillaud D. Bio-aerosols and the sick building syndrome. J Aerosol Med 1989; 2: 159–170.
35. Thrasher JD, Madison R, Broughton A, Gard Z. Building-related illness and antibodies to albumin conjugates of formaldehyde, toluene diisocyanate, and trimellitic anhydride. Am J Ind Med 1989; 15: 187–195.
36. Chang CC, Ruhl RA, Halpern GM, Gershwin ME. The sick building syndrome. I. Definition and epidemiological considerations. J Asthma 1993; 30: 285–295.
37. Hedge A, Mitchell GE, McCarthy JF, Ludwig J. Effects of a furniture-integrated breathing-zone filtration system on indoor air quality, sick building syndrome, and productivity. Indoor Air 1993; 3: 328–336.
38. Phoon WO, Seneviratne M, Rabone S, Gutierrez L. Building-related health problems: a system of study method. Indoor Environ 1995; 4: 204–226.
39. Menzies D, Pasztor J, Nunes F, Leduc J, Chan CH. Effect of a new ventilation system on health and well-being of office workers. Arch Environ Health 1997; 52: 360–367.
40. Lynch RM, Kipen H. Building-related illness and employee lost time following application of hot asphalt roof: a call for prevention. Toxicol Ind Health 1998; 14: 857–868.
41. Wargocki P, Wyon DP, Baik YK, Clausen G, Fanger PO. Perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity in an office with two different pollution loads. Indoor Air 1999; 9: 165–179.
42. Reynolds SJ, Black DW, Borin SS, Breuer G, Burmeister LF, Fuortes LJ, Smith TF, Stein MA, Subramanian P, Thorne PS, Whitten P. Indoor environmental quality in six commercial office buildings in the midwest United States. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2001; 16: 1065–1077.
43. Wong NH, Huang B. Comparative study of the indoor air quality of naturally ventilated and air-conditioned bedrooms of residential buildings in Singapore. Build Environ 2004; 39: 1115–1123.
44. Buchanan ISH, Mendell MJ, Mirer AG, Apte MG. Air filter materials, outdoor ozone and building-related symptoms in the BASE study. Indoor Air 2008; 18: 144–155.
45. Gou Z, Lau SSY. Sick building syndrome in open-plan offices: workplace design elements and perceived indoor environmental quality. J Facil Manag 2012; 10: 256–265.
46. Jung C-C, Liang H-H, Lee H-L, Hsu NY, Su HJ. Allostatic load model associated with indoor environmental quality and sick building syndrome among office workers. PLoS One 2014; 9: e95791.
47. Rahman IA, Putra JCP, Nagapan S. Correlation of indoor air quality with working performance in office building. Mod Appl Sci 2014; 8: 153.
48. Qiu Mei A, Othuman Mydin MA. Assessment of indoor environmental quality and occurrence of sick building syndrome in small offices in Penang, Malaysia. J Teknol 2015; 75: 69.
49. Shin DS, Jeong BY, Park MH. Structural equation modeling of office environment quality, sick building syndrome, and musculoskeletal complaints on aggregate satisfaction of office workers. Hum Factors Man 2018; 28: 148–153.
50. Fahad Alomirah H, Moda HM. Assessment of indoor air quality and users perception of a renovated office building in Manchester. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2020; 17: 1972.
51. Gawande S, Tiwari RR, Narayanan P, Bhadri A. Indoor air quality and sick building syndrome: are green buildings better than conventional buildings? Indian J Occup Environ Med 2020; 24: 30–32.
52. Sun C, Han Y, Luo L, Sun H. Effects of air temperature on cognitive work performance of acclimatized people in severely cold region in China. Indoor Built Environ 2020; 30: 816–837.
53. Hamdi ZB, Ahmad AG. Sick building syndrome: the effects of animal and plant-based adhesive in wood furniture. Arteks J Tek Arsit 2023; 8: 9–20.
54. Orru H, Olstrup H, Hagenbjörk A, Nordin S, Orru K. Exposures, symptoms and risk perception among office workers in relation to nanoparticles in the work environment. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2022; 19: 5789.
55. Woods JE. An engineering approach to controlling indoor air quality. Environ Health Perspect 1991; 95: 15–21.
56. Wong S-K, Lai W-C L, Ho DC-W, Chau KW, Lam L-K C, Ng H-F C. Sick building syndrome and perceived indoor environmental quality: a survey of apartment buildings in Hong Kong. Habitat Int 2009; 33: 463–471.
57. Al Momani HM, Ali HH. Sick building syndrome in apartment buildings in Jordan. Jordan J Civil Eng 2008; 2: 391–403.
58. Sun Y, Zhang Y, Bao L, Fan Z, Wang D, Sundell J. Effects of gender and dormitory environment on sick building syndrome symptoms among college students in Tianjin, China. Build Environ 2013; 68: 134–139.
59. Kamaruzzaman SN, Azmal AM. Evaluation of occupants’ well-being and perception towards indoor environmental quality in Malaysia affordable housing. J Facil Manag 2019; 17: 90–106.
60. Nduka DO, Oyeyemi KD, Ede AN, Olofinnade OM, Worgwu C, Worgwu C. Relationship between indoor environmental quality and sick building syndrome: a case study of selected student’s hostels in southwestern Nigeria. Cogent Soc Sci 2021; 7.
61. Seltzer JM. Building-related illnesses. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1994; 94: 351–361.
62. Walsh FW, Solomon DA. Disability evaluation in building-related health problems. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1994; 94: 376–379.
63. Wyon DP. Current indoor climate problems and their possible solution. Indoor Environ 1994; 3: 123–129.
64. Redlich CA, Sparer J, Cullen MR. Sick-building syndrome. Lancet 1997; 349: 1013–1016.
65. Brownson K. Breathing hospital air can make you sick. Health Care Manag 1999; 18: 65–72.
66. Dascalaki EG, Gaglia AG, Balaras CA, Lagoudi A. Indoor environmental quality in Hellenic hospital operating rooms. Energy Build 2009; 41: 551–560.
67. Loupa G, Fotopoulou S, Tsagarakis KP. A tool for analysing the interdependence of indoor environmental quality and reported symptoms of the hospitals’ personnel. J Risk Res 2017; 20(5): 678–691.
68. Akova İ, Kiliç E, Sümer H, Keklikçi T. Prevalence of sick building syndrome in hospital staff and its relationship with indoor environmental quality. Int J Environ Health Res 2022; 32: 1204–1219.
69. Eijkelenboom A, Kim DH, Bluyssen PM. First results of self-reported health and comfort of staff in outpatient areas of hospitals in the Netherlands. Build Environ 2020; 177: 106871.
70. Sayan HE, Dülger S. Evaluation of the relationship between sick building syndrome complaints among hospital employees and indoor environmental quality. Med Lav 2021; 112: 153–161.
71. Rahayu EP, Maharani R, Jepisah D, Suhara AI. Analysis of symptoms of sick building syndrome for nurses in hospital inpatient rooms. J Penelit Pendidik IPA 2023; 9: 770–774.
72. Bachmann MO, Myers JE. Influences on sick building syndrome symptoms in three buildings. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40: 245–251.
73. Jarvis JQ, Morey PR. Allergic respiratory disease and fungal remediation in a building in a subtropical climate. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2001; 16: 380–388.
74. Aditama TY, Andarini SL. Sick building syndrome. Med J Indones 2002; 124: 124.
75. Abdel-Hamid MA, A Hakim S, Elokda EE, Mostafa NS. Prevalence and risk factors of sick building syndrome among office workers. J Egypt Publ Health Assoc 2013; 88: 109–114.
76. Al-Hubail J, Al-Temeemi A-S. Assessment of school building air quality in a desert climate. Build Environ 2015; 94: 569–579.
77. Boerstra AC, Kulve M, Toftum J, Loomans MG, Olesen BW, Hensen JL. Comfort and performance impact of personal control over thermal environment in summer: Results from a laboratory study. Build Environ 2015; 87: 315–326.
78. Dorizas PV, Assimakopoulos M-N, Santamouris M. A holistic approach for the assessment of the indoor environmental quality, student productivity, and energy consumption in primary schools. Environ Monit Assess 2015; 187: 259.
79. Vafaeenasab MR, Morowatisharifabad MA, Taghi Ghaneian M, Hajhosseini M, Ehrampoush MH. Assessment of sick building syndrome and its associating factors among nurses in the educational hospitals of Shahid Sadoughi university of medical sciences, Yazd, Iran. Global J Health Sci 2014; 7: 247–253.
80. Nor Faeiza M, Juliana J, Chua PH. Retrofitting and purposed-built buildings: indoor air quality and sick building syndrome among private higher learning institution students in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor. Malaysian J Public Health Med 2016; 16: 106–112.
81. Vilcekova S, Meciarova L, Burdova EK, Katunska J, Kosicanova D, Doroudiani S. Indoor environmental quality of classrooms and occupants’ comfort in a special education school in Slovak Republic. Build Environ 2017; 120: 29–40.
82. Jiang J, Wang D, Liu Y, Xu Y, Liu J, Kuang J, Zou J, Zhu Q, Zhou W. A study on pupils’ learning performance and thermal comfort of primary schools in China. Build Environ 2018; 134: 102–113.
83. Kwong QJ, Abdullah J, Tan SC, Thio THG, Yeaw WS. A field study of indoor air quality and occupant perception in experimental laboratories and workshops. Manage Environ Qual 2019; 30: 467–482.
84. Nagy R, Mečiarová Ľ, Vilčeková S, Krídlová Burdová E, Košičanová D. Investigation of a ventilation system for energy efficiency and indoor environmental quality in a renovated historical building: a case study. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2019; 16: 4133.
85. Hu J, He Y, Hao X, Li N, Su Y, Qu H. Optimal temperature ranges considering gender differences in thermal comfort, work performance, and sick building syndrome: a winter field study in university classrooms. Energy Build 2022; 254: 111554.
86. Sulaiman R, Kamaruzzaman SN, Hanif NR, Salleh NM. Regression of perceived indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and prevalence sick building syndrome in museum environment. Adv Sci Lett 2013; 19: 3107–3110.
87. Nduka DO, Amusan L, Akinbile B, Owolabi JD. Environmental physical quantities impact on emergence of sick building syndrome on users of public buildings in Lagos, Nigeria. Int J Civ Eng Technol 2018; 9: 980–990.
88. Chang CC, Ruhl RA, Halpern GM, Gershwin ME. Building components contributors of the sick building syndrome. J Asthma 1994; 31: 127–137.
89. Colton MD, Laurent JGC, MacNaughton P, Kane J, Bennett-Fripp M, Spengler J, Adamkiewicz G. Health benefits of green public housing: associations with asthma morbidity and building-related symptoms. Am J Publ Health 2015; 105: 2482–2489.
90. Tham KW, Wargocki P, Tan YF. Indoor environmental quality, occupant perception, prevalence of sick building syndrome symptoms, and sick leave in a green mark platinum-rated versus a non-green mark-rated building: a case study. Sci Technol Built Environ 2015; 21: 35–44.
91. Norhidayah A, Chia-Kuang L, Azhar MK, Nurulwahida S. Indoor air quality and sick building syndrome in three selected buildings. Procedia Eng 2013; 53: 93–98.
92. Gardner TF, Kewley G. Is the ventilation engineer responsible for sick building syndrome damages? ASHRAE J 1990; 32(8): 22–25.
93. Fanger PO. Indoor air quality in the 21st century: search for excellence. Indoor Air 2000; 10: 68–73.
94. Wargocki P, Wyon DP, Sundell J, Clausen G, Fanger PO. The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity: effects of outdoor air supply rate. Indoor Air 2000; 10: 222–236.
95. Niemelä R, Seppänen O, Korhonen P, Reijula K. Prevalence of building-related symptoms as an indicator of health and productivity. Am J Ind Med 2006; 49: 819–825.
96. Abdul-Wahab S, Salem N, Ali S. Investigation of the environmental indicators at the main library of Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) in the sultanate of Oman. Sustain Environ Res 2015; 25: 131–139.
97. Singh J. Impact of indoor air pollution on health, comfort and productivity of the occupants. Aerobiologia 1996; 12: 121–127.
98. Tham KW. Effects of temperature and outdoor air supply rate on the performance of call center operators in the tropics. Indoor Air 2004; 14(Suppl 7): 119–125.
99. Wyon D, Fang L, Lagercrantz L, Fanger PO. Experimental determination of the limiting criteria for human exposure to low winter humidity indoors (RP-1160). HVAC R Res 2006; 12: 201–213.
100. Mendell MJ, Mirer AG. Indoor thermal factors and symptoms in office workers: findings from the US EPA BASE study. Indoor Air 2009; 19: 291–302.
101. Fisk WJ, Black D, Brunner G. Benefits and costs of improved IEQ in U.S. offices: benefits and costs of improved IEQ in U.S. offices. Indoor Air 2011; 21: 357–367.
102. Franke M, Nadler C. Towards a holistic approach for assessing the impact of IEQ on satisfaction, health, and productivity. Build Res Inf 2020; 49: 417–444.
103. Allen JG, MacNaughton P, Laurent JGC, Flanigan SS, Eitland ES, Spengler JD. Green buildings and health. Curr Environ Health Rep 2015; 2: 250–258.
104. Wargocki P, Wyon DP, Fanger PO. The performance and subjective responses of call-center operators with new and used supply air filters at two outdoor air supply rates. Indoor Air 2004; 14(Suppl 8): 7–16.
105. Witterseh T, Wyon DP, Clausen G. The effects of moderate heat stress and open-plan office noise distraction on SBS symptoms and on the performance of office work. Indoor Air 2004; 14(Suppl 8): 30–40.
106. Mysen M, Schild PG, Hellstrand V, Thunshelle K. Evaluation of simplified ventilation system with direct air supply through the facade in a school in a cold climate. Energy Build 2005; 37: 157–166.
107. Lan L, Wargocki P, Wyon DP, Lian Z. Effects of thermal discomfort in an office on perceived air quality, SBS symptoms, physiological responses, and human performance: the effects of thermal discomfort on health and human performance. Indoor Air 2011; 21: 376–390.
108. Wiik R. Indoor productivity measured by common response patterns to physical and psychosocial stimuli: indoor productivity measured by common response patterns. Indoor Air 2011; 21: 328–340.
109. Ghaffarianhoseini A, AlWaer H, Omrany H, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Alalouch C, Clements-Croome D, Tookey J. Sick building syndrome: are we doing enough? Architect Sci Rev 2018; 61: 99–121.
110. Fisk WJ, Rosenfeld AH. Estimates of improved productivity and health from better indoor environments. Indoor Air 1997; 7: 158–172.
111. Xiong L, Huang X, Li J, Mao P, Wang X, Wang R, Tang M. Impact of indoor physical environment on learning efficiency in different types of tasks: a 3 × 4 × 3 full factorial design analysis. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2018; 15: 1256.
112. Fisk WJ. How IEQ affects health, productivity. ASHRAE J 2002; 44(5): 56–60.
113. Palacios J, Eichholtz P, Kok N. Moving to productivity: the benefits of healthy buildings. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0236029.
114. Passarelli GR. Sick building syndrome: an overview to raise awareness. J Build Apprais 2009; 5: 55–66.
115. Rascu A, Moise L, Naghi E, Deleanu OC, Arghire O. Sick building syndrome-a reality and a challenge for physicians. J Environ Prot Ecol 2015; 16(3): 1132–1141.
116. Tsantaki E, Smyrnakis E, Constantinidis TC, Benos A. Indoor air quality and sick building syndrome in a university setting: a case study in Greece. Int J Environ Health Res 2022; 32: 595–615.
117. Mentese S, Mirici NA, Elbir T, Palaz E, Mumcuoğlu DT, Cotuker O, Bakar C, Oymak S, Otkun MT. A long-term multi-parametric monitoring study: indoor air quality (IAQ) and the sources of the pollutants, prevalence of sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms, and respiratory health indicators. Atmos Pollut Res 2020; 11: 2270–2281.
118. Zhang X, Li F, Zhang L, Zhao Z, Norback D. A longitudinal study of sick building syndrome (SBS) among pupils in relation to SO2, NO2, O3 and PM10 in schools in China. PLoS One 2014; 9: e112933.
119. Azlan NB, Mohd Suadi Nata DH, Mohd Uzid M. Assessment of indoor air quality at different sites of higher educational buildings of a university, Shah Alam. Malays J Med Health Sci 2022; 18: 1–7.
120. He Y, Zhang S, Wei X, Shang S, Wang Y, Zhang R, Guo J, Sun M, Li Y, Ma Y. A high environmental composite quality factor score was associated with the risk of sick building syndrome among adults in northeast China. J Environ Manag 2022; 306: 114458.
121. Singh J. Review: health, comfort and productivity in the indoor environment. Indoor Built Environ 1996; 5: 22–33.
122. Vernon HM, Bedforf T. A physiological study of the ventilation and heating in certain factories. Medical Research Council Indust Fatigue Res Board Rep 1926; 35.
123. Tran VV, Park D, Lee Y-C. Indoor air pollution, related human diseases, and recent trends in the control and improvement of indoor air quality. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2020; 17: 2927.
124. WHO. WHO announces COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic, http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronaviruscovid19/news/news/2020/3/who-announces-covid-19-outbreak-a-pandemic (2020, accessed 20 May 2021).
125. Abouleish MYZ. Indoor air quality and COVID-19. Publ Health 2021; 191: 1–2.
126. Menteşe S. Airborne bacteria and sick building syndrome (SBS). Viruses, bacteria and fungi in the built environment. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2022, pp. 147–178.
127. Liao C-M, Chang C-F, Liang H-M. A probabilistic transmission dynamic model to assess indoor airborne infection risks. Risk Anal 2005; 25: 1097–1107.
128. Horning A, Davis S. COVID-19 and the impacts to the workplace, https://www.csemag.com/articles/covid-19-and-the-impacts-to-the-workplace/?fbclid=IwAR2nw6R4_5BldBCY6gpPB7GLUWwYueATt2MszqGTtO422pOnCXswzlKMNBs (2020, accessed 21 May 2021). Online Referencing.
129. Baselga M, Alba JJ, Schuhmacher AJ. Impact of needle-point bipolar ionization system in the reduction of bioaerosols in collective transport. Sci Total Environ 2023; 855: 158965.
130. Cummings BE, Waring MS. Potted plants do not improve indoor air quality: a review and analysis of reported VOC removal efficiencies. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2020; 30: 253–261.
131. Rackes A, Waring MS. Using multiobjective optimizations to discover dynamic building ventilation strategies that can improve indoor air quality and reduce energy use. Energy Build 2014; 75: 272–280.
132. Memarzadeh F, Olmsted RN, Bartley JM. Applications of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation disinfection in health care facilities: effective adjunct, but not stand-alone technology. Am J Infect Control 2010; 38: S13–24.
133. Bradley D. Shedding ultraviolet light on coronavirus. Mater Today 2020; 37: 6–7.
134. Goel S, Hawi S, Goel G, Thakur VK, Agrawal A, Hoskins C, Pearce O, Hussain T, Upadhyaya HM, Cross G, Barber AH. Resilient and agile engineering solutions to address societal challenges such as coronavirus pandemic. Mater Today Chem 2020; 17: 100300.
135. Bolashikov ZD, Melikov AK. Methods for air cleaning and protection of building occupants from airborne pathogens. Build Environ 2009; 44: 1378–1385.
136. Megahed NA. Photocatalytic technology in architectural context: from science to societal debates. Indoor Built Environ 2014; 23: 603–614.
137. Chouirfa H, Bouloussa H, Migonney V, Falentin-Daudré C. Review of titanium surface modification techniques and coatings for antibacterial applications. Acta Biomater 2019; 83: 37–54.
138. Mata TM, Martins AA, Calheiros CSC, Villanueva F, Alonso-Cuevilla NP, Gabriel MF, Silva GV. Indoor air quality: a review of cleaning technologies. Environments 2022; 9: 118.
139. Aydogan A, Cerone R. Review of the effects of plants on indoor environments. Indoor Built Environ 2021; 30: 442–460.
140. Zamani ME, Jalaludin J, Shaharom N. Indoor air quality and prevalence of sick building syndrome among office workers in two different offices in Selangor. Am J Appl Sci 2013; 10: 1140–1147.
141. Vasile V, Petcu C, Iordache V. Experimental studies on TVOC concentrations and their relationships with indoor comfort parameters. Rev Chim (Bucharest) 2020; 70: 4145–4152.
142. Sakellaris I, Papadopoulos G, Saraga D, Xenofontos T, Tolis E, Panaras G, Bartzis J. Air quality versus perceived comfort and health in office buildings at Western Macedonia area, Greece during the pandemic period. Appl Sci 2023; 13: 1137.
143. Miller JD, Laflamme AM, Sobol Y, Lafontaine P, Greenhalgh R. Fungi and fungal products in some Canadian houses. Int Biodeterior 1988; 24: 103–120.
144. Nakazawa H, Ikeda H, Yamashita T, Hara I, Kumai Y, Endo G, Endo Y. A case of sick building syndrome in a Japanese office worker. Ind Health 2005; 43: 341–345.
145. Sun C, Zhang J, Guo Y, Fu Q, Liu W, Pan J, Huang Y, Zou Z, Huang C. Outdoor air pollution in relation to sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms, among residents in Shanghai, China. Energy Build 2018; 174: 68–76.
146. Alves M, Asbell P, Dogru M, Giannaccare G, Grau A, Gregory D, Kim DH, Marini MC, Ngo W, Nowinska A, Saldanha IJ, Villani E, Wakamatsu TH, Yu M, Stapleton F. TFOS lifestyle report: impact of environmental conditions on the ocular surface. Ocul Surf 2023; 29: 1–52.
147. Saad AF, Al-Awami HH, Hussein NA. Radon exhalation from building materials used in Libya. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 2014; 101: 15–19.
148. Susanto AD, Winardi W, Hidayat M, Wirawan A. The use of indoor plant as an alternative strategy to improve indoor air quality in Indonesia. Rev Environ Health 2021; 36: 95–99.
149. Jung C, Awad J. The improvement of indoor air quality in residential buildings in Dubai, UAE. Buildings 2021; 11: 250.
150. Ismaeel WS, Alamoudy FO, Sameh R. How renovation activities may jeopardise indoor air quality: accounting for short and long-term symptoms of sick building syndrome in educational buildings. Architect Eng Des Manag 2022; 18: 1–18.
151. Awad J, Jung C. Evaluating the indoor air quality after renovation at the greens in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Buildings 2021; 11: 353.
152. Jung C, Awad J. Improving the IAQ for learning efficiency with indoor plants in university classrooms in Ajman, United Arab Emirates. Buildings 2021; 11: 289.
153. Bedi TK, Bhattacharya SP. An investigative study on perceived indoor air quality during COVID-19 lockdown in India. J Inst Eng (India) Ser A 2021; 102: 885–900.
154. Megahed NA, Ghoneim EM. Indoor air quality: rethinking rules of building design strategies in post-pandemic architecture. Environ Res 2021; 193: 110471.
155. Lingua C, Crespi G, Becchio C, Corgnati SP. Designing IAQ-resilient post-pandemic buildings. Sustainability 2023; 15: 2187.
156. Kim J, de Dear R, Cândido C, Zhang H, Arens E. Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Build Environ 2013; 70: 245–256.
157. Lukcso D, Guidotti TL, Franklin DE, Burt A. Indoor environmental and air quality characteristics, building-related health symptoms, and worker productivity in a federal government building complex. Arch Environ Occup Health 2016; 71: 85–101.
158. Lee S, Park MH, Jeong BY. Gender differences in public office workers’ satisfaction, subjective symptoms and musculoskeletal complaints in workplace and office environments. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2018; 24: 165–170.
159. Nezis I, Biskos G, Eleftheriadis K, Fetfatzis P, Popovicheva O, Sitnikov N, Kalantzi OI. Linking indoor particulate matter and black carbon with sick building syndrome symptoms in a public office building. Atmos Pollut Res 2022; 13: 101292.
160. Stenberg B, Wall S. Why do women report “sick building symptoms” more often than men? Soc Sci Med 1995; 40: 491–502.
161. El-Batrawy OA. Indoor air quality and adverse health effects. World Appl Sci J 2013; 25: 163–169.
162. Messing K, Lippel K, Demers DL, Mergler D. Equality and difference in the workplace: physical job demands, occupational illnesses, and sex differences. NWSA J 2000; 12: 21–49.
163. de Zwart BC, Broersen JP, Frings-Dresen MH, Van Dijk FJ. Musculoskeletal complaints in The Netherlands in relation to age, gender and physically demanding work. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1997; 70: 352–360.
164. Bullinger M, Morfeld M, von Mackensen S, Brasche S. The sick-building-syndrome–do women suffer more? Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 1999; 202: 235–241.
165. Roncati L, Vadalà M, Laurino C, Palmieri B. Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS): women’s health issue. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2020; 47: 629.
166. Barmark M. Social determinants of the sick building syndrome: exploring the interrelated effects of social position and psychosocial situation. Int J Environ Health Res 2015; 25: 490–507.
167. Hoxha V, Shala F. The benefits and challenges of sustainable buildings in Prishtina, Kosovo. Farmaco 2019; 37: 1118–1152.
168. Amos D, Au-Yong CP, Musa ZN. Enhancing the role of facilities management in the fight against the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in developing countries’ public hospitals. J Facil Manag 2020; 19: 22–31.
169. Patil VS, Nandurdikar V, Shelar MN, Barahate SD, Pagare A, Chandratre M. Experimental investigation of CO2 level in the closed room including the effect of ventilation and use of snake plants. Sādhanā 2023; 48(2): 49.
170. Kaczmarczyk J, Melikov A, Fanger PO. Human response to personalized ventilation and mixing ventilation. Indoor Air 2004; 14(Suppl 8): 17–29.
171. Donkers A, Yang D, de Vries B, Baken N. Semantic web technologies for indoor environmental quality: A review and ontology design. Buildings 2022; 12: 1522.
172. Gao X, Jali ZM, Abdul Aziz AR, Hizaddin HF, Buthiyappan A, Jewaratnam J, Bello MM. Inherent health oriented design for preventing sick building syndrome during planning stage. J Build Eng 2021; 44: 103285.
173. Smith AJ, Fsadni A, Holt G. Indoor living plants’ effects on an office environment. Farmaco 2017; 35: 525–542.
174. Welch LS. Severity of health effects associated with building-related illness. Environ Health Perspect 1991; 95: 67–69.
175. Parkinson T, Schiavon S, de Dear R, Brager G. Overcooling of offices reveals gender inequity in thermal comfort. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 23684.
Cite
Cite
Cite
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: July 25, 2023
Issue published: February 2024
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Indoor and Built Environment.
View All Journal MetricsPublication usage*
Total views and downloads: 2154
*Publication usage tracking started in December 2016
Publications citing this one
Receive email alerts when this publication is cited
Web of Science: 57 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 65
- Sick House Syndrome in Dubai: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Residential and Demographic Risk Factors
- Interrelationship Between Indoor Air Quality and Indoor Dust in Four Schools across Dhanbad City, India
- Wind tunnel experimental study of the effect of shading devices on wind-driven single-sided natural ventilation
- Computing in Civil Engineering 2025
- Assessing the feasibility of TiO₂ photocatalytic coatings to improve indoor air quality in interactive scaled lecture hall models
- Enhancing Indoor Environmental Quality in Hot and Arid Climates: Experimental Evaluation of Plant-Based Air Purification and Microclimate Stabilization in Riyadh
- Characterization of the Response of Negative Air Ions Released by Green Tree Species to Humidity Using an Open Top Chamber
- Occupants’ perceived importance and satisfaction towards indoor environmental quality of a Malaysian green campus
- Facilitating Inclusivity in Multi-, Inter-, and Transdisciplinary Sustainable Built Environment Research in Emerging Economies
- Proceedings of the 15th REHVA HVAC World Congress - CLIMA 2025
- View More
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
IOM3 members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
IOM3 members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
