Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online September 6, 2012

The problem of interpretation in vignette methodology in research with young people

Abstract

In this article, we explore how interpretation is dealt with by researchers using a vignette methodology. Researchers using vignette methodology often struggle with interpretation: how to interpret the responses when participants shift between discussing the vignettes as themselves, taking the perspective of the character in the vignette and commenting on what ‘ought’ to happen. We argue that by foregrounding a consideration of the method with an explicitly articulated theoretical position of dialogicality, issues inherent in interpretation become a valuable addition to the research rather than an obstacle to be overcome. In this article, we discuss ‘Louise’ a young carer, detailing the various positions she takes in her talk about the vignette of Mary, a fictitious young carer, to illustrate how a perspective based in dialogical theory contributed to the analysis of her various moves through different identity positions.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Aveling E-L, Gillespie A (2008) Negotiating multiplicity: adaptive asymmetries within second-generation Turks’ ‘society of mind’. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 21: 1–23.
Bhaktin M (1973) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Ann Arbor, MI: Adrs.
Barter C, Reynold E (1999) The use of vignettes in qualitative research. Social Research Update. Available at: http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU2.5html
Barter C, Reynold E (2000) ‘I wanna tell you a story’: exploring the application of vignettes in qualitative research with children and young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3(4): 307–323.
Brondani MA, MacEntee MI, Bryant SR, et al. (2008) Using written vignettes in focus groups among older adults to discuss oral health as a sensitive topic. Qualitative Health Research 18(8): 1145–1153.
Crafter S, O’Dell L, de Abreu G, et al. (2009) Young people’s representations of ‘atypical’ work in UK society. Children & Society 23(3): 176–188.
Finch J (1987) Research note: the vignette technique in survey research. Sociology 21: 105–114.
Grossen M, Salazar-Orvig A (2006) The speaker’s positioning: a manifestation of the dialogicality of the self. In: Paper presented at the 4th international conference on the dialogical self, Braga, Portugal, 1–3 June 2006.
Hermans HJM (2001) The construction of a personal position repertoire: method and practice. Culture & Psychology 7(3): 323–366.
Hermans HJM (2002) The dialogical self as a society of mind. Theory and Psychology 12: 147–160.
Hughes R (1998) Considering vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behaviour. Sociology of Health & Illness 20(3): 381–400.
Hughes R, Huby M (2004) The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research. Social Work & Social Sciences Review 11(1): 36–51.
Jenkins N, Bloor M, Fischer J, et al. (2010) Putting it in to context: the use of vignettes in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research 10(2): 175–198.
MacAuley C (1996) Children in Long Term Foster Care: Emotional and Social Development. Hampshire: Avebury.
McKeganey N, Abel M, Hay G (1996) Contrasting methods of collecting data on injectors’ risk behavior. AIDS Care 8(5): 557–564.
Miller SA (1998) Developmental Research Methods (2nd Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Neff JA (1975) Interactional versus hypothetical others: the use of vignettes in attitude research. Sociology and Social Research 64(1): 105–125.
O’Sullivan-Lago R, de Abreu G (2008) Going back to their roots: maintaining continuity in the dialogical self though signs. Psychology & Society 1(1): 42–53.
Parkinson B, Manstead ASR (1993) Making sense of emotion in stories and social life. Cognition and Emotion 7(3–4): 295–323.
Prokopiou E (2007) Understanding the impact of Greek and Pakistani community schools on the development of ethnic minority young persons’ cultural and academic identities. PhD Thesis, University of Bedfordshire, UK.
Rahman N (1996) Caregivers’ sensitivity to conflict: the use of vignette methodology. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect 8(1): 35–47.
Skinner D, Valsiner J, Holland D (2001) Discerning the dialogical self: a theoretical and methodological examination of a Nepali adolescent’s narrative. Forum: Qualitative Social Research [online] 2(3). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs
Sleed M, Durrheim K, Kreil A, et al. (2002) The effectiveness of the vignette methodology: a comparison of written and video vignettes in eliciting responses about date rape. South African Journal of Psychology 32(3): 21–28.
Spalding N, Phillips T (2007) Exploring the use of vignettes: from validity to trustworthiness. Qualitative Health Research 17(7): 954–962.
Wertsch JV (1987) Modes of discourse in the nuclear arms debate. Current Research on Peace and Violence 10(2–3): 102–112.
Wertsch JV (1991) Voices of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whittaker A (2002) Eliciting qualitative information about induced abortion: lessons from North East Thailand. Health Care for Women International 23: 631–641.
Zittoun T (2006) Transitions: Development through Uses of Symbolic Resources. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

Biographies

Lindsay O’Dell is Director of Post Graduate Studies for the Faculty of Health and Social Care, The Open University. Her research interests concern children and young people who are in some way ‘different’, including young carers, language brokers and neurodiverse children, such as those with autism.
Sarah Crafter is a Lecturer in Developmental Psychology in the Faculty of Education and Language Studies at The Open University. Her research interests include home and school learning, culturally diverse childhoods, children who work and representations of space in child and adolescent mental health services.
Guida de Abreu is a Professor of Cultural Psychology at Oxford Brookes University and Director of the Doctoral Training Programme–Children and Young People: Psychological, Educational and Health Perspectives. Her research interests focus on the impact of sociocultural contexts in learning and identity development. Her current empirical work focuses on young people’s experiences of key aspects of their lives, such as being an immigrant or minority student, acting as a language broker, acting as a young carer and living with a chronic illness. This work includes the perspectives of teachers and parents.
Tony Cline is Co-director of the part-time professional doctorate programme for experienced educational psychologists at University College London and Visiting Professor of Educational Psychology at the University of Bedfordshire. Tony initially worked in inner city and suburban areas around London as a teacher in primary and secondary schools and as an educational psychologist. After a period as Principal Educational Psychologist for the Inner London Education Authority, he moved into higher education on a full-time basis, where he has led psychology and education studies teams. His current interests include learning difficulties of bilingual pupils, selective mutism in childhood, young people’s representations of child development and the analysis of the concept of school ethos.