Can artificial intelligence support creativity in early design processes?
Abstract
This study focuses on Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its transformative impact on design ideation. Generative AI, recognized for its ability to produce a wide array of design alternatives, has become an important tool in design, reshaping traditional methodologies. It facilitates the generation of novel and diverse design forms, acting as a co-creator in the design process. This technology, through machine learning and pattern recognition, analyzes extensive design datasets, enabling the production of innovative solutions. The utilization of generative AI extends beyond replicating AI-provided solutions; it aids in developing and influencing novel concepts, thus fostering original design solutions. This aligns with the concept of ‘reflective practice’ in design, where designers iteratively refine concepts through a dialogue between thought and action. The study employed a quasi-experimental design with 40 design students, randomly assigned to two groups of 20 each. Conducted in two phases, each phase involved a distinct urban furniture design task. In Phase 1, Group A was provided with a text-to-image generating AI tool, while Group B was not. In Phase 2, both groups undertook a similar task without AI assistance. This design exercise allowed for examining the influence of AI on creativity and cognitive load. Design outcomes from both tasks were anonymized and evaluated by experienced professionals using the Creative Product Semantic Scale (CPSS), which measures Novelty, Resolution, and Elaboration and Synthesis. Additionally, the NASA Task Load Index (NASA TLX) questionnaire assessed cognitive load aspects such as mental demand and effort. Findings suggest that generative AI significantly influences the creative design process, enhancing the quality of design outcomes and reducing cognitive load. The AI group demonstrated better performance in both tasks, indicating the impact of AI tools on design skills. This study underscores the potential of AI tools in design education, balancing cognitive load management with creativity enhancement.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Turing AM. Mind. 1950; 59(236): 433–460.
2. Schank RP. Explanation patterns: understanding mechanically and creatively. London, UK: Routledge, 2013.
3. De Vries K. You never fake alone: creative AI in action. Inf Commun Soc 2020; 23(14): 2110–2127.
4. Kavakoglu AA, Almag B, Eser B, et al. AI driven creativity in early design education: a pedagogical approach in the age of Industry 5.0. In: 40th Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe), Ghent, Belgium, 13–16 September 2022.
5. Tang T, Li P, Tang Q. New strategies and practices of design education under the background of artificial intelligence technology: online animation design studio. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 767295.
6. Onososen AO, Musonda I. Perceived benefits of automation and artificial intelligence in the AEC sector: an interpretive structural modeling approach. Front Built Environ 2022; 8: 864814.
7. Huang MH, Rust RT. Artificial intelligence in service. J Serv Res 2018; 21(2): 155–172.
8. Jibril U, Abdurrahman A, Abba H, et al. Introduction to artificial intelligence: applications and benefits to human life. Int J Innov Res Adv Stud. 2018; 5(3): 89–99.
9. Fez-Barringten B. Automatic design Managing the benefits and risks of architectural artificial intelligence (resolution). https://www.authorsden.com/ArticlesUpload/66755.pdf (accessed May 14 2024).
10. Tao B, Díaz V, Guerra Y. Artificial intelligence and education, challenges and disadvantages for the teacher. Arctic J 2019; 72(12): 30–50.
11. Al-Tkhayneh KM, Alghazo EM, Tahat D. The advantages and disadvantages of using artificial intelligence in education. J Educ Soc Res. 2023; 13(4): 105.
12. Janssen P, Stouffs R. Generative AI as a design partner. Int J Architect Comput 2020; 18(2): 147–163.
13. Ko J, Ennemoser B, Yoo W, et al. Architectural spatial layout planning using artificial intelligence. Autom ConStruct 2023; 154: 105019.
14. Kensek K. Integrating generative AI with virtual and augmented reality in architectural design. J Comput Des Eng 2021; 8(3): 857–869.
15. Chandrasekera T, Vo N, D'Souza N. The effect of subliminal suggestions on Sudden Moments of Inspiration (SMI) in the design process. Des Stud 2013; 34(2): 193–215.
16. De Bono E. Lateral thinking. New York, 1970, p. 70.
17. Goel AK. Design, analogy, and creativity. IEEE expert 1997; 12(3): 62–70.
18. Torrance EP. The Torrance tests of creative thinking norms—technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL. Scholastic Testing Service, Inc., 1998.
19. Rhodes M. An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan 1961; 42(7): 305–310.
20. Rosenman MA, Gero JS. Creativity in design using a design prototype approach. Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design. Oxfordshire, UK: Taylor & Francis Group, 1993, pp. 111–138.
21. Morgan DN. Creativity today: a constructive analytic review of certain philosophical and psychological Work. J Aesthet Art Critic 1953; 12(1): 1–24.
22. Hausman CR. Spontaneity: its arationality and its reality. Int Phil Q 1964; 4(1): 20–47.
23. Gero JS, Maher ML. Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design. London, UK: Routledge, 2013.
24. Daley J. Design creativity and the understanding of objects. Des Stud 1982; 3(3): 133–137.
25. Goldschmidt G, Tatsa D. How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity. Des Stud 2005; 26(6): 593–611.
26. Taura T, Nagai Y (eds). Design creativity 2010. London: Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
27. Bredeson PV. Designs for learning: a new architecture for professional development in schools. Thousand Oaks, UK: Corwin Press, 2002.
28. Dorst K. Frame innovation: create new thinking by design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015.
29. Lawson B. How designers think: the design process demystified. London, UK: Routledge, 2006.
30. Hillier B, Musgrove J, O’Sullivan P. Knowledge and design. In: Mitchell WJ (ed). Environmental Design: Research and Practice, Proceedings of the EDRA 3/AR 8 Conference. Los Angeles: University of California, 1972, vol 2(29.3).
31. Darke J. The primary generator and the design process. Des Stud 1979; 1(1): 36–44.
32. Schon DA. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
33. Oxman N. Age of entanglement. J Des Sci. 2016. http://jods.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/AgeOfEntanglement.
34. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci 1988; 12(2): 257–285.
35. Bjork RA. Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. Metacognition: Knowing about knowing 1994; 7: 185–205.
36. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Manhattan, NY: Harper, 1990.
37. Sweller J, Ayres PL, Kalyuga S, et al. The expertise reversal effect. Educ Psychol. 2003; 38(1): 23–31.
38. Kershaw TC, Holtta-Otto K, Lee YS. The effect of prototyping and critical feedback on fixation in engineering design. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society. 2011; (Vol. 33, No. 33).
39. Cross N. Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2001, pp. 79–103.
40. O'Quin K, Besemer SP. The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creat Res J 1989; 2(4): 267–278.
41. Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv Psychol 1988; 52: 139–183, North-Holland.
42. Fiorella L, Mayer RE. Eight ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ Psychol 2016; 51(1): 72–83.
43. Van Merriënboer JJ, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ 2010; 44(1): 85–93.
44. Deterding S. The lens of intrinsic skill atoms: a method for gameful design. Hum Comput Interact 2015; 30(3–4): 294–335.
45. Perkins DN, Salomon G. Transfer of learning. In: Seel P (ed) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 2012, pp. 3372–3375.
46. Mayer RE. Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In: Mayer RE (ed) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 43–71.
Cite
Cite
Cite
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: May 22, 2024
Issue published: March 2025
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in International Journal of Architectural Computing.
View All Journal MetricsPublication usage*
Total views and downloads: 4119
*Publication usage tracking started in December 2016
Publications citing this one
Receive email alerts when this publication is cited
Web of Science: 55 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 62
- What influences product designers’ use of large language models? An empirical study based on a SEM-ANN hybrid model
- Rethinking design roles: a study on designer and user perceptions during human-AI co-creation
- Meta-cognitive insights into cognitive offloading: mechanisms, interventions, and educational implications
- Creativity and artificial intelligence in design
- The Role of Designers in Human–AI Collaborative Design: Capturing the New Patterns in AI4UX Framework
- Driving sustainable innovation outcomes through employee AI collaboration with the mediating role of sustainable career capacities
- Evaluating AI-assisted creative ideation: A crossover study in higher education
- The Effects of Depth and Style of Icon Design on Task Performance Under Different Levels of Cognitive Load for Virtual Emergency
- AI-GENERATED LEARNING RESOURCES FOR CREATIVE FIELDS
- Are Eight Chatbots Better Than One? Boosting Chatbot Creative Outcomes via Exposure to Self- and Peer-Generated Examples
- View More
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
IOM3 members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
IOM3 members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
