Restricted access

Research article

First published online October 26, 2024

Request permissions

Patterns and trends of global social media censorship: Insights from 76 countries

Md. Sayeed Al-Zaman https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1433-7387 [email protected]View all authors and affiliations

Volume 87, Issue 5

https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485241288768

View article versions

Abstract
References

Abstract

We investigated global social media censorship trends in this research, addressing three essential scholarly gaps: (a) Variations in censorship across countries, (b) the platforms most heavily impacted, and (c) the evolution of censorship over time. With a focus on eight frequently targeted platforms—Facebook, YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok, Telegram, Twitter, and Reddit—we scrutinized 360 instances of social media censorship spanning 76 countries from 2006 to 2023. Our findings illustrate a growing governmental control, particularly noticeable in the Global South, with Turkey (6.39%), Sri Lanka (6.11%), Venezuela (5.56%), and Pakistan (5%) at the top of the list of frequently censoring countries. Among the platforms, Facebook (22.22%) and YouTube (21.94%) bear the brunt. Moreover, the escalating control over social media since 2018 signals an emergent global digital authoritarianism. Discernible geographical disparities in platform-specific restrictions prompt reflection on the nexus between censorship and political motivations. Additionally, our results suggest a plausible correlation between censorship practices and prevailing political systems. Enhanced comprehension of this problem could be derived from an augmented focus on the underlying reasons for censorship. This study offers a foundational evaluation of global social media censorship, setting it apart from internet censorship and laying the groundwork for further exploration.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Al’Uqdah SN, Jenkins K, Ajaa N (2019) Empowering communities through social media. Counselling Psychology Quarterly 32(2): 137–149.

Armstrong M (2022) Where social media is suppressed. Available at: https://www.statista.com/chart/23804/countries-blocking-social-media/ (accessed 26 October 2023).

Bischoff P (2023) Internet censorship 2023: A global map of internet restrictions. Available at: https://comparitech.com/blog/vpn-privacy/internet-censorship-map/ (accessed 22 October 2023).

Bryman A (2012) Social Research Methods, 4th ed Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, Dicenso A, et al. (2014) The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum 41(5): 545–547.

Chen Y, Yang DY (2019) The impact of media censorship: 1984 or brave new world? American Economic Review 109(6): 2294–2332.

Freedom House (2023) Freedom on the net research methodology. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-net/freedom-net-research-methodology (accessed 3 November 2023).

Gehlbach S, Sonin K (2014) Government control of the media. Journal of Public Economics 118. Elsevier B.V.: 163–171.

Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Gorokhovskaia Y, Shahbaz A and Slipowitz A (2023) Freedom in the World 2023: Marking 50 Years in the Struggle for Democracy. Washington: Freedom House. Available at: https:// freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/FIW_World_2023_DigtalPDF.pdf

Gorwa R, Binns R, Katzenbach C (2020) Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society 7(1). SAGE Publications Ltd: 1–15.

Hall JL, Aaron MD, Adams S, et al. (2020) A survey of worldwide censorship techniques. Internet-Draft. Available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-pearg-censorship-00.html.

Hao K (2021) How Facebook got addicted to spreading misinformation. Available at: https://technologyreview.com/2021/03/11/1020600/facebook-responsible-ai-misinformation/ (accessed 11 September 2022).

Islam MAMS, Sarkar T, Khan SH, et al. (2020) COVID-19–related infodemic and its impact on public health: A global social media analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103(4): –9.

Jones MR, Karsten H (2008) Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly 32(1): 127–157.

Kellam M, Stein EA (2016) Silencing critics: Why and how presidents restrict Media freedom in democracies. Comparative Political Studies 49(1): 36–77.

Leong C, Pan SL, Bahri S, et al. (2019) Social media empowerment in social movements: Power activation and power accrual in digital activism. European Journal of Information Systems 28(2): 173–204.

Maheshwari S, Holpuch A (2023) Why countries are trying to ban TikTok. The New York Times, 10 October. New York, USA. Available at: https://nytimes.com/article/tiktok-ban.html.

Master A, Garman C (2023) A Worldwide View of Nation-State Internet Censorship. California, USA: Free and Open Communications on the Internet. Available at: https://censorbib.nymity.ch/pdf/Master2023a.pdf.

Moynihan H (2021) Battle lines being drawn over online freedoms in Asia. Available at: https://chathamhouse.org/2021/03/battle-lines-being-drawn-over-online-freedoms-asia (accessed 4 November 2023).

Nazmi S (2019) Why India shuts down the internet more than any other democracy. BBC News, 19 December. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50819905 (accessed 14 August 2020).

Nott L (2023) Free speech on social media: The complete guide. Available at: https://freedomforum.org/free-speech-on-social-media/ (accessed 22 October 2023).

Novotná M, Macková A, Rossini P (2023) Incivility and intolerance in COVID-19 discussions on Facebook. Social Media and Society 9(4): 1–12.

Oremus W (2022) How social media ‘censorship’ became a front line in the culture war. Available at: https://washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/10/09/social-media-content-moderation/ (accessed 22 October 2023).

Samples J (2019) Why The Government Should Not Regulate Content Moderation of Social Media. California, USA: CATO Institute. Available at: https://cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa_865.pdf.

Shahbaz A (2019) The rise of digital authoritarianism.

Shahbaz A, Funk A (2021) Freedom on the Net 2021: The Global Drive to Control Big Tech. Washington, USA: Freedom House. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2021-09/FOTN_2021_Complete_Booklet_09162021_FINAL_UPDATED.pdf.

Slutskiy P (2020) Freedom of expression, social media censorship, and property rights. Tripodos 48: 53–67.

Statista (2023) Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2023, ranked by number of active users. Available at: https://statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ (accessed 13 March 2023).

Surfshark (2023) Internet shutdown tracker. Available at: https://surfshark.com/research/internet-censorship (accessed 26 October 2023).

Tableau Software (2022) Tableau desktop. 2022.4. Washington, USA: Tableau.

Taylor L (2020) COVID-19 misinformation sparks threats and violence against doctors in Latin America. BMJ 370. British Medical Journal Publishing Group: –2.

Thurmond VA (2001) The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 33(3): 253–258.

Ventresca MJ, Mohr JW (2017) Archival research methods. In: Baum JAC (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. New York, USA: Wiley, 805–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164061.ch35.

Ward M, Beyer J (2019) Vulnerable Landscapes: Case Studies of Violence and Disinformation. Washington, USA: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Available at: https://wilsoncenter.org/publication/vulnerable-landscapes-case-studies-violence-and-disinformation.

Zittrain JL, Faris R, Noman H, et al. (2017) The Shifting Landscape of Global Internet Censorship. Massachusetts, USA: Internet Monitor. Available at: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/33084425/The Shifting Landscape of Global Internet Censorship- Internet Monitor 2017.pdf.

|

You currently have no access to this content. Visit the access options page to authenticate.