The role of wearable devices in pre-anaesthesia check-up facilitation: A scoping review
Abstract
Background:
The global population rise has increased surgeries to over 300 million annually. Operations on patients with multiple comorbidities contribute to postoperative complications affecting 15%–20% of surgical patients. Traditional pre-anaesthesia check-up (PAC) relies on snapshot assessments, potentially missing dynamic health changes. This review explored the integration of wearable technology in preoperative assessment to enhance monitoring through continuous data collection.
Methods:
This scoping review was conducted according to PRISMA ScR guidelines. Literature search performed across PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and Scopus. Inductive thematic analysis, following Braun and Clarke, was used to synthesise findings. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Results:
A total of 17 full-text articles were included, and thematic analysis revealed: Benefits: Wearable devices enable continuous monitoring of physiological parameters and improve patient engagement. Challenges: Implementation barriers include data accuracy concerns and healthcare provider training needs. Future Directions: Advances in sensor technology may enhance personalised medicine. Most studies focused on limb-worn devices, showing correlations with functional tests. Risk of bias was low to moderate, with methodological rigour but limited sample sizes.
Conclusion:
Integrating wearable technology into PAC can improve surgical outcomes. Addressing implementation challenges is crucial for optimising perioperative care for surgical patients.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Angelucci A, Aliverti A 2023 An IMU-based wearable system for respiratory rate estimation in static and dynamic conditions Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology 14 351–363 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-023-00657-3
Angelucci A, Greco M, Canali S, et al. 2023 Fitbit data to assess functional capacity in patients before elective surgery: Pilot prospective observational study Journal of Medical Internet Research 25 e42815
Aromataris E, Munn Z (Eds) 2020 JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis JBI [Online] Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global [Accessed October 2025]
Assenza G, Fioravanti C, Guarino S, et al. 2020 New perspectives on wearable devices and electronic health record systems In: 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT, Roma, 3–5 June 2020 pp 740–745 New York, IEEE
Böhmer AB, Wappler F, Zwissler B 2025 Preoperative assessment of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: Updated guideline from the European Society of anesthesiology and intensive care Eur J Anaesthesiol 42 (1) 3–24
Bove LA 2019 Increasing patient engagement through the use of wearable technology The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 15 535–539
Braun V, Clarke V 2006 Using thematic analysis in psychology Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2) 77–101
Canali S, Schiaffonati V, Aliverti A 2022 Challenges and recommendations for wearable devices in digital health: Data quality, interoperability, health equity, fairness PLOS Digit Health 1 e0000104
Chiu PL, Li H, Yap KY-L, et al. 2023 Virtual reality–based intervention to reduce preoperative anxiety in adults undergoing elective surgery JAMA Network Open 6 e2340588
Cho S, Ensari I, Weng C, Kahn MG, Natarajan K 2021 Factors affecting the quality of person-generated wearable device data and associated challenges: Rapid systematic review JMIR mHealth uHealth 9 e20738
Cilliers L 2020 Wearable devices in healthcare: Privacy and information security issues Health Information Management Journal 49 150–156
Cooper DM, Bhuskute N, Walsh G 2022 Exploring the impact and acceptance of wearable sensor technology for pre- and postoperative rehabilitation in knee replacement patients: A U.K.-based pilot study JB JS Open Access 7 (2) e2100154
Cos H, Li D, Williams G, et al. 2021 Predicting outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatectomy using wearable technology and machine learning: Prospective cohort study Journal of Medical Internet Research 23 (3) e23595
Dehghan F, Jalali R, Bashiri H 2019 The effect of virtual reality technology on preoperative anxiety in children: A Solomon four-group randomized clinical trial Perioperative Medicine 8 5
Dinh-Le C, Chuang R, Chokshi S, et al. 2019 Wearable health technology and electronic health record integration: Scoping review and future directions JMIR mHealth and uHealth 7 e12861
Duarte-Rojo A, Bloomer PM, Rogers RJ, et al. 2021 Introducing EL-FIT (Exercise and Liver FITness): A smartphone app to prehabilitate and monitor liver transplant candidates Liver Transplantation 27 (4) 502–512
Fuller D, Colwell E, Low J, et al. 2020 Reliability and validity of commercially available wearable devices for measuring steps, energy expenditure, and heart rate: Systematic review JMIR mHealth and uHealth 8 e18694
Gagnon M-P, Ouellet S, Attisso E, et al. 2024 Wearable devices for supporting chronic disease self-management: Scoping review Interactive Journal of Medical Research 13 e55925
Greco M, Angelucci A, Avidano G, et al. 2023 Wearable health technology for preoperative risk assessment in elderly patients: The WELCOME study Diagnostics (Basel) 13 (4) 630
Health TLD 2023 Wearable health data privacy The Lancet Digital Health 5 e174
Hedrick TL, Hassinger TE, Myers E, et al. 2020 Wearable technology in the perioperative period: Predicting risk of postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery Dis Colon Rectum 63 (4) 538–544
Hoff T, Kitsakos A, Silva J 2024 A scoping review of the patient experience with wearable technology DIGITAL HEALTH 10 20552076241308439
Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, et al. 2018 Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of copyright (1148552), Canadian intellectual property office, industry Canada Education for Information 34 (4) 285–291
Jafleh EA, Alnaqbi FA, Almaeeni HA, et al. 2024 The role of wearable devices in chronic disease monitoring and patient care: A comprehensive review Cureus 16 (9) e68921
Jones L, Tan L, Carey-Jones S, et al. 2021 Can wearable technology be used to approximate cardiopulmonary exercise testing metrics? Perioperative Medicine (London) 10 (1) 9
Kane WJ, Hassinger TE, Myers EL, et al. 2022 Wearable technology and the association of perioperative activity level with 30-Day readmission among patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 36 (2) 1584–1592
Kang HS, Exworthy M 2022 Wearing the future – wearables to empower users to take greater responsibility for their health and care: Scoping review JMIR mHealth uHealth 10 e35684
Lee J, Kong S, Shin S, et al. 2024 Wearable device–based intervention for promoting patient physical activity after lung cancer surgery: A nonrandomized clinical trial JAMA Network Open 7 (9) e2434180
Lewis ZH, Ottenbacher KJ, Fisher SR, et al. 2020 Effect of electronic activity monitors and pedometers on health: Results from the TAME health pilot randomized pragmatic trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (18) 6800
Liao Y, Thompson C, Peterson S, et al. 2019 The future of wearable technologies and remote monitoring in health care American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book 39 115–121
Lu L, Zhang J, Xie Y, et al. 2020 Wearable health devices in health care: Narrative systematic review JMIR mHealth and uHealth 8 e18907
Mattison G, Canfell O, Forrester D, et al. 2022 The influence of wearables on health care outcomes in chronic disease: Systematic review Journal of Medical Internet Research 24 e36690
Mylius CF, Krijnen WP, Takken T, et al. 2021a Objectively measured preoperative physical activity is associated with time to functional recovery after hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer surgery: A pilot study Perioperative Medicine (London) 10 (1) 33
Mylius CF, Paats WL, Takkenberg JJM, et al. 2021b Moderate to vigorous physical activity is associated with shorter time to functional recovery after cardiac surgery Journal of the American Heart Association 10 (22) e022648
Nakajima H, Yokoyama Y, Inoue T, et al. 2020 How many steps per day are necessary to prevent postoperative complications following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgeries for malignancy? Annals of Surgical Oncology 27 (5) 1387–1397
Nepogodiev D, Martin J, Biccard B, et al. 2020 Global burden of postoperative death The Lancet 393 (10170) 401
Novoa NM, Varela G, Jiménez MF, et al. 2011 Value of the average basal daily walked distance measured using a pedometer to predict maximum oxygen consumption per minute in patients undergoing lung resection☆☆☆. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 39 (5) 756–762
Phillips SM, Cadmus-Bertram L, Rosenberg D, et al. 2018 Wearable technology and physical activity in chronic disease: Opportunities and challenges American Journal of Preventive Medicine 54 144–150
Richards SJG, Jerram PM, Brett C, et al. 2020 The association between low pre-operative step count and adverse post-operative outcomes in older patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery Perioperative Medicine (London) 9 20
Rizzo MG, Costello JP, Luxenburg D, et al. 2023 Augmented reality for perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing surgery JAMA Network Open 6 e2329310
Smuck M, Odonkor CA, Wilt JK, et al. 2021 The emerging clinical role of wearables: Factors for successful implementation in healthcare NPJ Digital Medicine 4 (45) 1–8
Sprogis SK, Currey J, Considine J 2019 Patient acceptability of wearable vital sign monitoring technologies in the acute care setting: A systematic review Journal of Clinical Nursing 28 2732–2744
Sun V, Dumitra S, Ruel N, et al. 2017 Wireless monitoring program of patient-centered outcomes and recovery before and after major abdominal cancer surgery JAMA Surgery 152 (9) 852859
Syversen A, Dosis A, Jayne D, et al. 2024 Wearable sensors as a preoperative assessment tool: A review Sensors 24 482
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. 2018 PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation Annals of Internal Medicine 169 (7) 467–473
Vijayan V, Connolly JP, Condell J, et al. 2021 Review of wearable devices and data collection considerations for connected health Sensors 21 5589
Vuppalapati C, Ilapakurti A, Kedari S 2016 The role of big data in creating sense EHR, an integrated approach to create next generation mobile sensor and wearable data driven Electronic Health Record (EHR) In: 2016 IEEE Second International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService), Oxford, 29 March 2016 - 1 April 2016 pp 293–296 New York, IEEE
Waller E, Sutton P, Rahman S, et al. 2022 Prehabilitation with wearables versus standard of care before major abdominal cancer surgery: A randomised controlled pilot study (Trial Registration: NCT04047524). Surgical Endoscopy 36 (2) 1008–1017
Zarate Rodriguez JG, Cos H, Srivastava R, et al. 2023 Preoperative levels of physical activity can be increased in pancreatectomy patients via a remotely monitored, telephone-based intervention: A randomized trial Surgery in Practice and Science 15 100212
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
Cite
Cite
Cite
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: March 17, 2026
Keywords
PubMed: 41841189
Authors
Author contributions
SD: Conceptualisation, search strategy, study selection, data extraction, manuscript drafting and editing.
AB: Search strategy, study selection and manuscript editing.
SP: Search strategy, data extraction, study selection, manuscript drafting.
BY: Conceptualisation, study selection, manuscript drafting.
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Journal of Perioperative Practice.
View All Journal MetricsPublication usage*
Total views and downloads: 25
*Publication usage tracking started in December 2016
Publications citing this one
Receive email alerts when this publication is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref:
There are no citing articles to show.
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
AFPP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
AFPP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
