Work intensification: A systematic review of studies from 1989 to 2022
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Work intensification can lead to both work-related and non-work-related outcomes that positively and negatively affect the employee, organization, and job in question. The criticality of this phenomena necessitates conducting a systematic review to capture the essence of the extant literature.
OBJECTIVE:
This paper presents a systematic review of the literature on work intensification from 1989 to 2022. It reviews the conceptualization of the construct, explores the factors influencing work intensification, identifies its outcomes, moderators, and mediators, and provides a review of the theories that have been used to support the phenomena of work intensification.
METHODS:
The systematic review employed the PRISMA approach to screen 2823 records from the Web of Science database and extract 74 quantitative studies for final examination.
RESULTS:
Firstly, work intensification has primarily been conceptualized through various constructs such as workload, long work hours, and time pressure. Secondly, there are well-established positive and negative outcomes associated with work intensification, either directly or through mediators. Thirdly, both the conservation of resource theory and the job-demands resource theory are widely utilized to support models related to work intensification.
CONCLUSION:
The study urges practitioners to enhance their efforts in effectively managing employees’ intensified work demands, particularly in relation to work overload, working hours, and time pressure. By addressing these factors, organizations can minimize negative outcomes and promote positive consequences.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Mauno S, Herttalampi M, Minkkinen J, Feldt T, Kubicek B. Is work intensification bad for employees? A review of outcomes for employees over the last two decades. Work & Stress. 2022;1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2022.2080778
2. Adisa TA, Antonacopoulou E, Beauregard TA, Dickmann M, Adekoya OD. Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on employees’ boundary management and work–life balance. British Journal of Management. 2022;33(4):1694–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12643
3. Afshari L, Hayat A, Ramachandran KK, Bartram T, Balakrishnan BK. Threat or opportunity: Accelerated job demands during COVID-19 pandemic. Personnel Review. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2021-0098
4. Venz L, Boettcher K. Leading in times of crisis: How perceived COVID-19 related work intensification links to daily e-mail demands and leader outcomes. Applied Psychology. 2022;71(3):912–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12357
5. Huo ML, Boxall P, Cheung GW. Lean production, work intensification and employee wellbeing: Can line-manager support make a difference? Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2022;43(1):198–220. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0143831X19890678
6. Mauno S, Kubicek B, Minkkinen J, Korunka C. Antecedents of intensified job demands: Evidence from Austria. Employee Relations: The International Journal. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2018-0094
7. Korunka C, Kubicek B, Paskvan M, Ulferts H. Changes in work intensification and intensified learning: Challenge or hindrance demands? Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2013-0065
8. Gallup. Why leaders must address the employee wellbeing deficit. 2022. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/393524/why-leaders-address-employee-wellbeing-deficit.aspx
9. Champion Health. The workplace health report: 2022. 2022. https://championhealth.co.uk/insights/guides/workplace-health-report/
10. Dupret K, Pultz S. Hard/heartworker:Work intensification in purpose-driven organizations. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-07-2020-1989
11. Bliese PD, Castro CA. Role clarity, work overload and organizational support: Multilevel evidence of the importance of support. Work & Stress. 2000;14(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/026783700417230
12. Eurofound. European quality of life survey 2016. 2016. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/european-quality-of-life-surveys/european-quality-of-life-survey-2016
13. Ho H, Kuvaas B. Human resource management systems, employee well-being, and firm performance from the mutual gains and critical perspectives: The well-being paradox. Human Resource Management. 2020;59(3):235–53.
14. Granter E, McCann L, Boyle M. Extreme work/normal work: Intensification, storytelling and hypermediation in the (re)construction of ‘the New Normal’. Organization. 2015;22(4):443–56. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1350508415573881
15. Neirotti P. Work intensification and employee involvement in lean production: New light on a classic dilemma. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2020;31(15):1958–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1424016
16. Sayin FK, Denton M, Brookman C, Davies S, Chowhan J, Zeytinoglu IU. The role of work intensification in intention to stay: A study of personal support workers in home and community care in Ontario, Canada. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2021;42(4):917–36. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0143831X18818325
17. Mariappanadar S. Stakeholder harm index: A framework to review work intensification from the critical HRM perspective. Human Resource Management Review. 2014;24(4):313–29.
18. Boxall P, Macky K. High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being. Work, Employment and Society. 2014;28(6):963–84. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0950017013512714
19. Ogbonnaya CN, Valizade D. Participatory workplace activities, employee-level outcomes and the mediating role of work intensification. Management Research Review. 2015;38(5):540–58.
20. Borle P, Boerner-Zobel F, Voelter-Mahlknecht S, Hasselhorn HM, Ebener M. The social and health implications of digital work intensification. Associations between exposure to information and communication technologies, health and work ability in different socio-economic strata. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2021;94(3):377–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01588-5
21. Kubicek B, Paskvan M, Korunka C. Development and validation of an instrument for assessing job demands arising from accelerated change: The intensification of job demands scale (IDS). European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2015;24(6):898–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.979160
22. Macky K, Boxall P. High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being: A study of New Zealand worker experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 2008;46(1):38–55. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1038411107086542
23. Jahan N, Naveed S, Zeshan M, Tahir MA. How to conduct a systematic review: A narrative literature review. Cureus. 2016;8(11). https://dx.doi.org/10.7759%2Fcureus.864
24. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–41.
25. Short J. The art of writing a review article. Journal of Management. 2009;35(6):1312–7. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206309337489
26. Newman A, Obschonka M, Moeller J, Chandan GG. Entrepreneurial passion: A review, synthesis, and agenda for future research. Applied Psychology. 2021;70(2):816–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12236
27. Zhu J, Liu W. A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics. 2020;123(1):321–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
28. Norris M, Oppenheim C. Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. Journal of Informetric. 2007;1(2):161–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001
29. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination: Systematic Reviews: CRD’s Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. University of York, York, England; 2009.
30. Paradies Y. A systematic review of empirical research on self-reported racism and health. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2006;35(4):888–901. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl056
31. Greenglass ER, Burke RJ, Moore KA. Reactions to increased workload: Effects on professional efficacy of nurses. Applied Psychology. 2003;52(4):580–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00152
32. Paskvan M, Kubicek B, Prem R, Korunka C. Cognitive appraisal of work intensification. International Journal of Stress Management. 2016;23(2):124. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0039689
33. Lisa F, Wang J, Mustafa K, Ronald JB. Work hours, work intensity, satisfactions and psychological well-being among hotel managers in China. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal. 2010;17(1):79–93.
34. Wang F, Pollock KE, Hauseman C. School principals’ job satisfaction: The effects of work intensification. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy. 2018;185:73.
35. Unger D, Sonnentag S, Niessen C, Kuonath A. The longer your work hours, the worse your relationship? The role of selective optimization with compensation in the associations of working time with relationship satisfaction and self-disclosure in dual-career couples. Human Relations. 2015;68(12):1889–912.
36. Poulose S, Dhal M. Role of perceived work–life balance between work overload and career commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-03-2018-0117
37. Aleksić D, Mihelic KK, Cerne M, Skerlavaj M. Interactive effects of perceived time pressure, satisfaction with work–family balance (SWFB), and leader-member exchange (LMX) on creativity. Personnel Review. 2017;46:662–79.
38. Burke RJ, Singh P, Fiksenbaum L. Work intensity: Potential antecedents and consequences. Personnel Review. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481011030539
39. Silla I, Gamero N. Psychological safety climate and professional drivers’ well-being: The mediating role of time pressure. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2018;53:84–92.
40. Stiglbauer B. Under what conditions does job control moderate the relationship between time pressure and employee well-being? Investigating the role of match and personal control beliefs. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2017;38(5):730–48.
41. Altinay L, Dai YD, Chang J, Lee CH, Zhuang WL, Liu YC. How to facilitate hotel employees’ work engagement: The roles of leader-member exchange, role overload and job security. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2017-0613
42. Jones E, Chonko L, Rangarajan D, Roberts J. The role of overload on job attitudes, turnover intentions, and salesperson performance. Journal of Business Research. 2007;60(7):663–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.02.014
43. Brett JM, Stroh LK. Working 61 plus hours a week: Why do managers do it? Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88(1):67. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.67
44. Ten Brummelhuis LL, Rothbard NP, Uhrich B. Beyond nine to five: Is working to excess bad for health? Academy of Management Discoveries. 2017;3(3):262–83. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2015.0115
45. Zhang L, Seo J. Held captive in the office: An investigation into long working hours among Korean employees. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2018;29(7):1231–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1192053
46. Altaf A, Awan MA. Moderating effect of workplace spirituality on the relationship of job overload and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics. 2011;104(1):93–9.
47. Shirom A, Nirel N, Vinokur AD. Overload, autonomy, and burnout as predictors of physicians’ quality of care. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2006;11(4):328.
48. Beehr TA, Walsh JT, Taber TD. Relationships of stress to individually and organizationally valued states: Higher order needs as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1976;61(1):41. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.61.1.41
49. Ulferts H, Korunka C, Kubicek B. Acceleration in working life: An empirical test of a sociological framework. Time & Society. 2013;22(2):161–85.
50. Hewlett SA, Luce CB. Extreme jobs: The dangerous allure of the 70-hour workweek. Harvard Business Review. 2006;84(12):49–59.
51. White M, Hill S, McGovern P, Mills C, Smeaton D. High-performance’management practices, working hours and work–life balance. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 2003;41(2):175–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00268
52. Fiksenbaum L, Jeng W, Koyuncu M, Burke RJ. Work hours, work intensity, satisfactions and psychological well-being among hotel managers in China. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601011016925
53. De Clercq D, Belausteguigoitia I. Reducing the harmful effect of work overload on creative behaviour: Buffering roles of energy-enhancing resources. Creativity and Innovation Management. 2019;28(1):5–18.
54. Alfes K, Shantz AD, Ritz A. A multilevel examination of the relationship between role overload and employee subjective health: The buffering effect of support climates. Human Resource Management. 2018;57(2):659–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21859
55. Qureshi I, Jamil R, Iftikhar M, Arif S, Lodhi S, Naseem I, Zaman K. Job stress, workload, environment and employees turnover intentions: Destiny or choice. Archives of Sciences (Sciences Des Archives). 2012;65(8).
56. Pradana A, Salehudin I. Work overload and turnover intention of junior auditors in greater Jakarta, Indonesia. The South East Asian Journal of Management. 2015;9(2):108–24.
57. Edgar F, Geare A, Zhang JA. A comprehensive concomitant analysis of service employees’ well-being and performance. Personnel Review. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2016-0108
58. Chipunza C, Samuel MO. Effect of role clarity and work overload on perceptions of justice and job insecurity after downsizing. Journal of Social Sciences. 2012;32(3):243–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2012.11893069
59. Montani F, Dagenais-Desmarais V. Unravelling the relationship between role overload and organizational citizenship behaviour: A test of mediating and moderating effects. European Management Journal. 2018;36(6):757–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.03.001
60. Coverman S. Role overload, role conflict, and stress: Addressing consequences of multiple role demands. Social Forces. 1989;67(4):965–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/67.4.965
61. Lu Z, Jeeyoung S. Held captive in the office: An investigation into long working hours among Korean employees. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2016.
62. Uysal LDHT, Aydemir S. The effect of external motivation and work overload on career anchor development. Pacific Business Review International. 2018;11(6):17–27.
63. Yip B, Rowlinson S, Siu OL. Coping strategies as moderators in the relationship between role overload and burnout. Construction Management and Economics. 2008;26(8):871–82.
64. Jha S, Balaji MS, Yavas U, Babakus E. Effects of frontline employee role overload on customer responses and sales performance: Moderator and mediators. European Journal of Marketing. 2017;51(2):282–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2015-0009
65. Parent-Thirion A, Vermeylen G, van Houten G, Lyly-Yrjänäinen MBI, Cabrita J, Niedhammer I. Fifth European working conditions survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 2012.
66. Kopperud KH, Buch R, Skogen C. Work overload and leader–member exchange: The moderating role of psychological flexibility. Journal of General Management. 2021;46(3):173–84. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0306307020942905
67. del Carmen Triana M, Porter CO, DeGrassi SW, Bergman M. We’re all in this together. . . except for you: The effects of workload, performance feedback, and racial distance on helping behavior in teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2013;34(8):1124–44.
68. Fisher DM. A multilevel cross-cultural examination of role overload and organizational commitment: Investigating the interactive effects of context. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2014;99(4):723. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0035861
69. Jaramillo F, Mulki JP, Boles JS. Workplace stressors, job attitude, and job behaviors: Is interpersonal conflict the missing link? Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management. 2011;31(3):339–56. https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134310310
70. Karatepe OM. The effects of work overload and work-family conflict on job embeddedness and job performance: The mediation of emotional exhaustion. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111311322952
71. Salin D, Notelaers G. Friend or foe? The impact of high-performance work practices on workplace bullying. Human Resource Management Journal. 2020;30(2):312–26.
72. Mulki JP, Lassk FG, Jaramillo F. The effect of self-efficacy on salesperson work overload and pay satisfaction. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management. 2008;28(3):285–97. https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134280305
73. Shantz A, Arevshatian L, Alfes K, Bailey C. The effect of HRM attributions on emotional exhaustion and the mediating roles of job involvement and work overload. Human Resource Management Journal. 2016;26(2):172–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12096
74. Jensen JM, Patel PC, Messersmith JG. High-performance work systems and job control: Consequences for anxiety, role overload, and turnover intentions. Journal of Management. 2013;39(6):1699–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419663
75. Park R, Jang SJ. Family role overload’s relationship with stress and satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2016-0020
76. Wang G, Liu X, Liu Y. Role overload, knowledge acquisition and job satisfaction: An ambidexterity perspective on boundary-spanning activities of IT employees. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2019;30(4):728–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1494027
77. Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist. 1989;44(3):513.
78. Carnes AM. Bringing work stress home: The impact of role conflict and role overload on spousal marital satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2017;90(2):153–76.
79. Eissa G, Lester SW. Supervisor role overload and frustration as antecedents of abusive supervision: The moderating role of supervisor personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2017;38(3):307–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2123
80. Ilies R, Schwind KM, Wagner DT, Johnson MD, DeRue DS, Ilgen DR. When can employees have a family life? The effects of daily workload and affect on work-family conflict and social behaviors at home. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007;92(5):1368. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1368
81. Kimura T, Bande B, Fernandez-Ferrín P. Work overload and intimidation: The moderating role of resilience. European Management Journal. 2018;36(6):736–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.03.002
82. Pluta A, Rudawska A. The role of the employees’ individual resources in the perception of the work overload. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-08-2020-0241
83. Green F. It’s been a hard day’s night: The concentration and intensification of work in late twentieth-century Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 2001;39(1)53–80.
84. Green F. Work intensification, discretion, and the decline in well-being at work. Eastern Economic Journal. 2004;30(4):615–25.
85. Kissi E, Asare OA, Agyekum K, Agyemang DY, Labaran M. Ascertaining the interaction effects among organisational citizenship behaviour, work overload and employees’ performance in the Ghanaian construction industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2019;68(7):1235–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2018-0262
86. Hassen TB. The state of the knowledge-based economy in the Arab world: Cases of Qatar and Lebanon. EuroMed Journal of Business. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-03-2020-0026
87. Carmeli A, Levi A, Peccei R. Resilience and creative problem-solving capacities in project teams: A relational view. International Journal of Project Management. 2021;39(5):546–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.03.007
88. Chen L, Chen M, Zhang H, Yan XM. Interrupting the crossover effect of leader’s role overload on employee’s negative affect: The moderating role of self-concordance goal. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2021;37(4):361–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-04-2021-0219
89. Gonzalez RVD. Innovative performance of project teams: The role of organizational structure and knowledge-based dynamic capability. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2021-0259
90. Guinan PJ, Parise S, Langowitz N. Creating an innovative digital project team: Levers to enable digital transformation. Business Horizons. 2019;62(6):717–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.07.005
91. Delisle J. Working time in multi-project settings: How project workers manage work overload. International Journal of Project Management. 2020;38(7):419–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.04.001
92. Gallagher VC, Meurs JA. Positive affectivity under work overload: Evidence of differential outcomes. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration. 2015;32(1):4–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1309
93. Khan I, Shahid M, Nawab S, Wali SS. Influence of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards on employee performance: The banking sector of Pakistan. Academic Research International. 2013;4(1):282.
94. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
95. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality. 1985;19(2):109–34.
96. Treuren GJ, Fein EC. Off-the-job embeddedness moderates work intensity on employee stress. In Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship. 2022;10(1):103–18. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-01-2021-0015
97. Ali SA, Mujahid K, Umar M. Feel like quitting the job? A causal attribution approach to social and work overload consequences. Management Research Review. 2022;45(11):1431–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2021-0180
98. Ahuja MK, Chudoba KM, Kacmar CJ, McKnight DH, George JF. IT road warriors: Balancing work-family conflict, job autonomy, and work overload to mitigate turnover intentions. Mis Quarterly. 2007;1–17.
99. Yen YS. Job demands and technology overload influencing work stress in organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aslib Journal of Information Management, (ahead-of-print). 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-07-2022-0344
100. Hensel PG, Kacprzak A. Job overload, organizational commitment, and motivation as antecedents of cyberloafing: Evidence from employee monitoring software. European Management Review. 2020;17(4):931–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12407
101. Gürlek M. How does work overload affect unethical behaviors? The Mediating Role of Pay Dissatisfaction. 2020.
102. Bliese PD, Castro CA. Role clarity, work overload and organizational support: Multilevel evidence of the importance of support. Work & Stress. 2000;14(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/026783700417230
103. Demirbag KŞ, Demirbag O. Who said there is no place like home? Extending the link between quantitative job demands and life satisfaction: A moderated mediation model. Personnel Review, (ahead-of-print). 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2022-0048
104. Fatima T, Bilal AR, Waqas M, Imran MK. Keeping up with this workload is difficult: The ramifications of work overload on career resilience. Kybernetes, (ahead-of-print). 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2022-0063
105. Dodanwala TC, San Santoso D, Shrestha P. The mediating role of work–family conflict on role overload and job stress linkage. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, (ahead-of-print). 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-12-2021-0153
106. Tang WG, Vandenberghe C. The reciprocal relationship between affective organizational commitment and role overload: When autonomy need satisfaction meets the individual self-concept. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2020;93(2):353–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12295
107. Tams S, Ahuja M, Thatcher J, Grover V. Worker stress in the age of mobile technology: The combined effects of perceived interruption overload and worker control. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2020;29(1):101595.
108. Solberg E, Wong SI. Crafting one’s job to take charge of role overload: When proactivity requires adaptivity across levels. The Leadership Quarterly. 2016;27(5):713–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.03.001
109. Avery DR, Tonidandel S, Volpone SD, Raghuram A. Overworked in America? How work hours, immigrant status, and interpersonal justice affect perceived work overload. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2010;25(2):133–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011019348
110. Chesley N. Information and communication technology use, work intensification and employee strain and distress. Work, Employment and Society. 2014;28(4):589–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013500112
111. Matthews RA, Winkel DE, Wayne JH. A longitudinal examination of role overload and work–family conflict: The mediating role of interdomain transitions. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2014;35(1):72–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1855
Cite
Cite
Cite
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: September 28, 2023
Issue published: March 8, 2024
Keywords
Authors
Author Contributions
Aiman Niazi and Mumtaz Ali Memon jointly conceptualized the idea, planned the overall study design, and drafted the key sections (Introduction, Conceptualization, and Discussion and Recommendations). Naukhez Sarwar drafted the methods section and provided partial assistance in data extraction and analysis. Asfia Obaid assisted in the initial conceptualization, drafted the conclusion section (including limitations and future directions), meticulously edited the final draft of the paper, and formatted the manuscript according to the journal’s guidelines. Muhammad Zeeshan Mirza assisted in data analysis and interpreted the results, and edited the first draft of the paper and improved weak sections. Kainaat Amjad assisted in data extraction and contributed to the revisions and editing of the revised version.
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Publication usage*
Total views and downloads: 929
*Publication usage tracking started in December 2016
Publications citing this one
Receive email alerts when this publication is cited
Web of Science: 8 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 2
- Early career teachers’ beliefs and management of work intensification in Norway and Spain
- The Intensification of Work for Cabin Crew and Its Consequences
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
