Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Volume 26 Issue 2, April 2023

Volume 26 Issue 2, April 2023

Feature Topic: Rigorous and Impactful Literature Reviews

  • Jean-Pascal Gond
  • Sébastien Mena
  • Szilvia Mosonyi
Abstract
Although numerous books and articles provide toolkit approaches to explain how to conduct literature reviews, these prescriptions regard literature reviewing as the production of representations of academic fields. Such representationalism is rarely ...
Open AccessReview articleFirst published July 9, 2020pp. 195–228
  • Martin R. W. Hiebl
Abstract
Systematic review techniques are about to become the “new normal” in reviews of management research. However, there is not yet much advice on how to organize the sample selection process as part of such reviews. This article addresses this void and ...
Open AccessResearch articleFirst published January 29, 2021pp. 229–261
  • Garima Sharma
  • Pratima (Tima) Bansal
Abstract
Systematic reviews of academic research have not impacted management practice as much as many researchers had hoped. Part of the reason is that researchers and managers differ significantly in their knowledge systems—in both what they know and how they ...
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published October 23, 2020pp. 262–291
  • Zeki Simsek
  • Brian Fox
  • Ciaran Heavey
Abstract
In this study, we first develop a framework that presents systematicity as an encompassing orientation toward the application of explicit methods in the practice of literature reviews, informed by the principles of transparency, coverage, saturation, ...
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published May 4, 2021pp. 292–321

Publication Notice

Free accessCorrectionFirst published March 31, 2023pp. 322

Regular Articles

  • Nathan A. Bowling
  • Jason L. Huang
  • Cheyna K. Brower
  • Caleb B. Bragg
Abstract
Several recent studies have examined the prevention, causes, and consequences of insufficient effort responding (IER) to surveys. Scientific progress in this area, however, rests on the availability of construct-valid IER measures. In the current paper we ...
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published December 6, 2021pp. 323–352
  • Seang-Hwane Joo
  • Philseok Lee
  • Jung Yeon Park
  • Stephen Stark
Abstract
Although the use of ideal point item response theory (IRT) models for organizational research has increased over the last decade, the assessment of construct dimensionality of ideal point scales has been overlooked in previous research. In this study, we ...
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published October 18, 2021pp. 353–382