Although numerous books and articles provide toolkit approaches to explain how to
conduct literature reviews, these prescriptions regard literature reviewing as the
production of representations of academic fields. Such representationalism is rarely
...
Open AccessReview articleFirst published July 9, 2020pp. 195–228
Systematic review techniques are about to become the “new normal” in reviews of management
research. However, there is not yet much advice on how to organize the sample selection
process as part of such reviews. This article addresses this void and ...
Open AccessResearch articleFirst published January 29, 2021pp. 229–261
Systematic reviews of academic research have not impacted management practice as much
as many researchers had hoped. Part of the reason is that researchers and managers
differ significantly in their knowledge systems—in both what they know and how they
...
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published October 23, 2020pp. 262–291
In this study, we first develop a framework that presents systematicity as an encompassing
orientation toward the application of explicit methods in the practice of literature
reviews, informed by the principles of transparency, coverage, saturation, ...
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published May 4, 2021pp. 292–321
Several recent studies have examined the prevention, causes, and consequences of insufficient
effort responding (IER) to surveys. Scientific progress in this area, however, rests
on the availability of construct-valid IER measures. In the current paper we ...
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published December 6, 2021pp. 323–352
Although the use of ideal point item response theory (IRT) models for organizational
research has increased over the last decade, the assessment of construct dimensionality
of ideal point scales has been overlooked in previous research. In this study, we
...
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published October 18, 2021pp. 353–382