Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals

Abstract

In this article, we engage the tension between the failures and possibilities of theories to which we hold attachments. The failure of theory for us is also the failure of qualitative research because as scholars who engage in philosophically informed and critical inquiries, research and theory are inextricably bound. Drawing on our individual and collective experiences, we explore moments when the promise of philosophy crumbled as seismic shifts in culture, politics, and public health rendered useless theories we had long relied upon. We attempt to bring the affective feeling of failure into a productive space and explore how the failure of theory in our lives and our research is not static but rather shifts with the material conditions of the world.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Ahmed S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.
Barad K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Butler J. (1995). For a careful reading. In Benhabib S., Butler J., Cornell D., Fraser N. (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 127–143). Routledge.
Caputo J. (1993). Against ethics: Contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. Indiana University Press.
Caputo J. (2016). Teaching the event: Deconstruction, hauntology, and the scene of pedagogy. In Seery A., Dunne E. (Eds.), The pedagogics of unlearning (pp. 111–130). Punctum Press.
Denzin N., Giardina M. (2017). Qualitative inquiry in neoliberal times. Routledge.
Derrida J. (2007). A certain impossible possibility of saying the event (G. Walker, Trans.). Critical Inquiry, 33(2), 441–461. (Original work published in 2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/4497730
Foucault M. (1972). Sheridan Smith A.M., Trans The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1971).
Foucault M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books.
Foucault M. (1980). Two lectures (colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham & kate Soper, Trans.). In Gordon C. (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings (pp. 109–133). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1977).
Haraway D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Duke University Press.
H.B. 7. Individual Freedom. (2022). Florida house of representatives legislative session. https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Bills/billsdetail.aspx?BillId=76555
Henderson E. F. (2018). Feminist conference time: Aiming (not) to have been there. In Taylor Y., Lahad K. (Eds.), Feeling academic in the neoliberal university: Feminist flights, fights, and failures (pp. 33–60). Palgrave MacMillan.
Jackson A. Y., Mazzei L. (2011). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
Kuhn T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Lather P. (2000). Drawing the line at angels: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography. In Pierre E.St., Pillow W. (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 284–312). Routledge.
Lyotard J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition. Manchester University Press.
Manning E. (2016). The minor gesture: Duke University Press.
Manning E. (2018). Words that invent worlds. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(10), 817–837.
Manning E., Massumi B. (2013). For a pragmatics of the useless: Propositions for thought [Video file]. Retrieved from. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp5REJAi20o&app=desktop
Massumi B. (2009). Of microperception and micropolitics: An interview with brian Massumi. INFLeXions, 3, 1–20. Retrieved from. https://www.inflexions.org/n3_Of-Microperception-and-Micropolitics-An-Interview-with-Brian-Massumi.pdf
Richardson L., St Pierre E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978). Sage.
Roy R., Uekusa S. (2020). Collaborative autoethnography: “Self-reflection” as a timely alternative research approach during the global pandemic. Qualitative Research Journal, 20(4), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-06-2020-0054
Ulmer J. (2016). Writing slow ontology. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(3), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416643994
Van Cleave J. (2018). Engaging uselessness: Philosophical reading and dwelling in the excess. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 681–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417732092
West C. (2004). Democracy matters: Winning the fight against imperialism. Penguin Press.
Wolgemuth J. R., Marn T., Barko T., Weaver-Hightower M. (2022). Radical uncertainty is not enough: (In)Justice matters of post-qualitative research. International Review of Qualitative Research, 14(4), 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447211012658

Biographies

Jessica Van Cleave is a professor of curriculum and instruction in the College of Education at Gardner-Webb University. Her work explores the intersections and entanglements of critical, poststructural, and posthuman theories with writing, ethics, and responsibility in qualitative and postqualitative methodologies. Her interests span a variety of areas in education, including literacy education, digital pedagogy, and education policy, with a particular focus on expanding notions of writing and thinking in education research, practice, and theory.
Travis Marn (PhD, University of South Florida) is an associate professor of educational psychology and research methods at Southern Connecticut State University’s College of Education. Using qualitative and post-qualitative methodologies, he explores questions of justice, identity, and subjectivity through new materialist, posthumanist, and poststructural frameworks.
Jennifer R. Wolgemuth is a professor in educational research at the University of South Florida where she directs the Graduate Certificate in Qualitative Research. Her research agenda focuses on ethics and validity in social science research. Drawing on critical, poststructural, and new materialist theories, she explores inquiry as an agential process that simultaneously investigates and creates lives and communities to and for which the researcher is responsible.